F. Ferrante

17 papers receiving 261 citations

Peers

F. Ferrante
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 150
  • Pharmacology 113
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 29
  • Surgery 113
  • Neurology 29
Replace Xia Bi with:
Xia Bi China
Conor W. O’Neill United States
B. Hägglöf United States
Ajay Antony United States
Fumio Asato Japan
Leif Anderberg Sweden
Stan Pelofsky United States
Damián Bendersky Argentina
Hiroyuki Koshimizu Japan
Harmandeep Singh India
F. Ferrante relative to Xia Bi China Xia Bi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.6×
Xia Bi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by F. Ferrante

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of F. Ferrante's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by F. Ferrante with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites F. Ferrante more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by F. Ferrante

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by F. Ferrante. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by F. Ferrante. The network helps show where F. Ferrante may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside F. Ferrante, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with F. Ferrante Line = papers co-authored together F. Ferrante links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 2001148
2 199828
3 200917
4 201214
5 200613
6 200613
7 202311
8 20247
9 19897
10 20047
11 20246
12 20245
13
Post hoc analysis to evaluate the effect of recombinant factor IX Fc fusion protein (rFIXFc) prophylaxis in adults and adolescents with target joints and hemophilia B
20163
14 20062
15 20241
16
Individualised Prophylaxis with Recombinant Factor IX FC Fusion Protein (RFIXFC) in Adults/Adolescents With Haemophilia B: Updated Interim Results of the B-YOND Extension Study
20171
17 20241
18
New trends in the diagnosis and therapy of acute cholangitis.
19840

About F. Ferrante

F. Ferrante is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Surgery, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Psychiatry and Mental health and Pharmacology, having authored 18 papers that have together received 284 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (4 papers), Hemophilia Treatment and Research (3 papers), Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (3 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (3 papers), Blood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms (3 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (2 papers), Neurology and Historical Studies (1 paper) and HIV Research and Treatment (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (150 citations), Pharmacology (113 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (29 citations), Surgery (113 citations) and Neurology (29 citations). F. Ferrante has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Argentina and Chile. Frequent co-authors include Ellen Wen-Ching Ko, Alfonso Iorio, Cristina Santoro, Giancarlo Agnelli, Patrizia Pignoloni, Francesca Biondo, Agustín Ibáñez, Eugenia Hesse, M. G. Mazzucconi and Andrea Slachevsky. Their work appears in journals such as Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine, Alzheimer s & Dementia, Pharmacological Research, Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders and The Clinical Neuropsychologist.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact