F. E. Kenyon

586 citations
22 papers · 462 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

F. E. Kenyon

19 papers receiving 349 citations

Peers

F. E. Kenyon
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 245
  • Philosophy 152
  • Clinical Psychology 189
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 46
  • Social Psychology 72
Replace N. L. Gittleson with:
N. L. Gittleson United Kingdom
Th. Videbech Denmark
Pierre Pichot France
Gavin P Tennent United Kingdom
Dorothy Terry United States
Manfred S. Guttmacher United States
Karen Kernberg Bardenstein United States
PAUL N. GRAFFAGNINO United States
D. Stafford‐Clark United Kingdom
Heinz G.F. Schepank Germany
F. E. Kenyon relative to N. L. Gittleson United Kingdom N. L. Gittleson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
N. L. Gittleson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by F. E. Kenyon

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of F. E. Kenyon's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by F. E. Kenyon with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites F. E. Kenyon more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by F. E. Kenyon

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by F. E. Kenyon. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by F. E. Kenyon. The network helps show where F. E. Kenyon may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 1 scholars most cited alongside F. E. Kenyon, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with F. E. Kenyon Line = papers co-authored together F. E. Kenyon links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1964147
2 197674
3 196546
4 196845
5 196329
6 196623
7 196214
8 196312
9 196812
10 196811
11 196911
12 19689
13
Homosexuality in the female.
19757
14 19755
15 19625
16 19803
17 19742
18
Psychiatric emergencies and the law : the impact of the Mental Health Act (1959)
19682
19 19792
20 19691

About F. E. Kenyon

F. E. Kenyon is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology, Philosophy, Dermatology and Gender Studies, having authored 22 papers that have together received 462 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy (5 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (4 papers), Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (3 papers), Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (2 papers), Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse (2 papers), Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases (2 papers), Acne and Rosacea Treatments and Effects (2 papers) and Pain Management and Placebo Effect (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (245 citations), Philosophy (152 citations), Clinical Psychology (189 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (46 citations) and Social Psychology (72 citations). F. E. Kenyon has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include M. Rutter. Their work appears in journals such as The British Journal of Psychiatry, Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, British Journal of Dermatology, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology and Postgraduate Medical Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact