F. Dowell

608 citations
27 papers · 486 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

F. Dowell

26 papers receiving 463 citations

Peers

F. Dowell
Comparison fields: 5 of 37
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 351
  • Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes 44
  • Spectroscopy 111
  • Organic Chemistry 189
  • Materials Chemistry 249
Replace F. Debeauvais with:
F. Debeauvais France
C. S. Bak United States
M. Á. Pérez Jubindo Spain
A. R. Tajbakhsh United Kingdom
Hp. Schad Switzerland
R. Van der Haegen Belgium
Herbert Groothues Germany
J. P. Parneix France
Dave C. Williamson Mexico
Luca De Gaetani Italy
F. Dowell relative to F. Debeauvais France F. Debeauvais's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
F. Debeauvais · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by F. Dowell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of F. Dowell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by F. Dowell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites F. Dowell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by F. Dowell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by F. Dowell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by F. Dowell. The network helps show where F. Dowell may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 3 scholars most cited alongside F. Dowell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with F. Dowell Line = papers co-authored together F. Dowell links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 197968
2 198360
3 198344
4 197838
5 198538
6 197834
7 198734
8 198532
9 197825
10 198823
11 197817
12 198813
13 19899
14 19899
15 19889
16 19839
17 19797
18 19797
19 19882
20 19912

About F. Dowell

F. Dowell is a scholar working on Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Organic Chemistry, Materials Chemistry, Computer Networks and Communications and Mechanical Engineering, having authored 27 papers that have together received 486 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Liquid Crystal Research Advancements (19 papers), Material Dynamics and Properties (11 papers), Surfactants and Colloidal Systems (10 papers), Nonlinear Dynamics and Pattern Formation (5 papers), Advanced Materials and Mechanics (5 papers), Molecular spectroscopy and chirality (4 papers), Phase Equilibria and Thermodynamics (3 papers) and Chemical Thermodynamics and Molecular Structure (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (351 citations), Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes (44 citations), Spectroscopy (111 citations), Organic Chemistry (189 citations) and Materials Chemistry (249 citations). F. Dowell has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Daniel E. Martire, Edmund A. DiMarzio and George H. Stewart. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Chemical Physics, Inorganica Chimica Acta, Journal of Applied Physics, Chromatographia and Journal of Statistical Physics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact