F. Cesarini

589 citations
23 papers · 293 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

F. Cesarini

21 papers receiving 271 citations

Peers

F. Cesarini
Comparison fields: 5 of 34
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 234
  • Signal Processing 31
  • Artificial Intelligence 88
  • Media Technology 23
  • Information Systems 40
Replace Allen Condit with:
Allen Condit United States
Julie Borsack United States
Sebastian Krinninger Austria
Sundararajan Sellamanickam United States
Pau Riba Spain
Ning-San Chang United States
Tianlei Hu China
Yung‐Chen Chou Taiwan
Yi Wen China
Binyuan Hui China
F. Cesarini relative to Allen Condit United States Allen Condit's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×13×
Allen Condit · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by F. Cesarini

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of F. Cesarini's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by F. Cesarini with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites F. Cesarini more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by F. Cesarini

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by F. Cesarini. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by F. Cesarini. The network helps show where F. Cesarini may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 12 scholars most cited alongside F. Cesarini, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with F. Cesarini Line = papers co-authored together F. Cesarini links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199858
2 200351
3 200126
4 199925
5 200224
6 200224
7 200320
8 200414
9 199611
10 19998
11 20027
12 20026
13 20026
14 19823
15 19882
16 19912
17 19832
18
Subsumption Computation on an Object-Oriented Data Model
19911
19
An Assessment of the Query-Processing Capability of DBMAC.
19831
20 19871

About F. Cesarini

F. Cesarini is a scholar working on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Artificial Intelligence, Signal Processing, Computer Networks and Communications and Information Systems, having authored 23 papers that have together received 293 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Image Retrieval and Classification Techniques (9 papers), Handwritten Text Recognition Techniques (8 papers), Algorithms and Data Compression (7 papers), Advanced Database Systems and Queries (6 papers), Data Management and Algorithms (5 papers), Semantic Web and Ontologies (4 papers), Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques (3 papers) and Web Data Mining and Analysis (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (234 citations), Signal Processing (31 citations), Artificial Intelligence (88 citations), Media Technology (23 citations) and Information Systems (40 citations). F. Cesarini has collaborated with scholars based in Italy. Frequent co-authors include G. Soda, Simone Marinai, Marco Gori, Enrico Francesconi, Lorenzo Sarti, Jenny Sheng, Emanuele Marino, Alessandro Artale, Michelangelo Diligenti and A.M. Colla. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal on Document Analysis and Recognition (IJDAR), Data & Knowledge Engineering, Information Systems, Pattern Analysis and Applications and ACM Transactions on Database Systems.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact