Evan Schaffer
Impact in
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Neural dynamics and brain function
- Visual perception and processing mechanisms
- Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Sensory Systems top 10%
- Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
Papers in
-
- Visual perception and processing mechanisms 4
- Neural dynamics and brain function 4
- Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies 1
-
- Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research 1
- Co-authors
- Hirofumi Ozeki (2 shared papers)Ian M. Finn (2 shared papers)David Ferster (2 shared papers)Kenneth D. Miller (2 shared papers)L. F. Abbott (3 shared papers)Srdjan Ostojic (1 shared paper)Richard Axel (2 shared papers)Gloria B. Choi (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Neuron (2 papers)Nature Communications (1 paper)Neuroscience Research (1 paper)Nature (1 paper)PLoS Computational Biology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesJapanFrance
In The Last Decade
Evan Schaffer
9 papers receiving 494 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 40
- Cognitive Neuroscience 374
- Sensory Systems 37
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 98
- Human-Computer Interaction 11
- Developmental Neuroscience 4
Countries citing papers authored by Evan Schaffer
This map shows the geographic impact of Evan Schaffer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Evan Schaffer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Evan Schaffer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Evan Schaffer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Evan Schaffer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Evan Schaffer. The network helps show where Evan Schaffer may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 23 scholars most cited alongside Evan Schaffer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2009 | 347 | |
| 2 | 2013 | 42 | |
| 3 | 2018 | 41 | |
| 4 | 2023 | 30 | |
| 5 | 2009 | 16 | |
| 6 | 2005 | 14 | |
| 7 | 2016 | 8 | |
| 8 | 2010 | 2 | |
| 9 | 2026 | 1 | |
| 10 | 2024 | 0 |
About Evan Schaffer
Evan Schaffer is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Sensory Systems and Biophysics, having authored 10 papers that have together received 501 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Visual perception and processing mechanisms (4 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (4 papers), Multisensory perception and integration (2 papers), Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts (1 paper), Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (1 paper), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (1 paper), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (1 paper) and Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (374 citations), Sensory Systems (37 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (98 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (11 citations) and Developmental Neuroscience (4 citations). Evan Schaffer has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Japan and France. Frequent co-authors include Hirofumi Ozeki, Ian M. Finn, David Ferster, Kenneth D. Miller, L. F. Abbott, Srdjan Ostojic, Richard Axel, Gloria B. Choi, Frank H. Durgin and Elizabeth M. C. Hillman. Their work appears in journals such as Neuron, Nature Communications, Neuroscience Research, Nature and PLoS Computational Biology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.