Eva van Leer

22 papers receiving 764 citations

Peers

Eva van Leer
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
  • Speech and Hearing 147
  • Physiology 515
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 77
  • Clinical Psychology 109
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 79
Replace Ana Cristina Côrtes Gama with:
Ana Cristina Côrtes Gama Brazil
Leslie E. Glaze United States
Leonardo Wanderley Lopes Brazil
Vanessa Veis Ribeiro Brazil
Alcione Ghedini Brasolotto Brazil
Mary J. Sandage United States
Dominique Morsomme Belgium
Mary Andrianopoulos United States
Richard I. Zraick United States
Barbara Weinrich United States
Eva van Leer relative to Ana Cristina Côrtes Gama Brazil Ana Cristina Côrtes Gama's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.0×
Ana Cristina Côrtes Gama · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Eva van Leer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Eva van Leer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eva van Leer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eva van Leer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Eva van Leer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eva van Leer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eva van Leer. The network helps show where Eva van Leer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside Eva van Leer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Eva van Leer Line = papers co-authored together Eva van Leer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2020168
2 2009122
3 199979
4 200778
5 201161
6 201550
7 200544
8 201644
9 201636
10 201326
11 202117
12 201815
13 201612
14 202111
15 20237
16 20187
17 20226
18 20205
19 20162
20 20131

About Eva van Leer

Eva van Leer is a scholar working on Physiology, Clinical Psychology, Speech and Hearing, Artificial Intelligence and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 24 papers that have together received 794 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Voice and Speech Disorders (12 papers), Dysphagia Assessment and Management (4 papers), Stuttering Research and Treatment (4 papers), Speech Recognition and Synthesis (3 papers), Phonetics and Phonology Research (2 papers), Digital Mental Health Interventions (2 papers), Tracheal and airway disorders (2 papers) and Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Speech and Hearing (147 citations), Physiology (515 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (77 citations), Clinical Psychology (109 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (79 citations). Eva van Leer has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Sweden and Colombia. Frequent co-authors include Nadine P. Connor, Miriam van Mersbergen, Lyn S. Turkstra, Edie R. Hapner, Eric J. Hunter, Mary J. Sandage, Lady Catherine Cantor-Cutiva, Pasquale Bottalico, Susanna Whitling and Xuefu Zhou. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Voice, American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, Journal of Communication Disorders and Aphasiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact