Eva Schöll

533 citations
13 papers · 355 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Eva Schöll

11 papers receiving 345 citations

Peers

Eva Schöll
Comparison fields: 5 of 24
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 289
  • Artificial Intelligence 152
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 212
  • Acoustics and Ultrasonics 2
  • Instrumentation 7
Replace Lukas Hanschke with:
Lukas Hanschke Germany
Raphaël S. Daveau Denmark
Paweł Mrowiński Poland
Jonathan H. Prechtel Switzerland
Alistair J. Brash United Kingdom
Alexander Schlehahn Germany
Christian Kessler Germany
Xiangjun Shang China
Kazuya Ohira Japan
Sascha Kolatschek Germany
Eva Schöll relative to Lukas Hanschke Germany Lukas Hanschke's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Lukas Hanschke · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Eva Schöll

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Eva Schöll's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eva Schöll with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eva Schöll more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Eva Schöll

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eva Schöll. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eva Schöll. The network helps show where Eva Schöll may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Eva Schöll, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Eva Schöll Line = papers co-authored together Eva Schöll links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 201886
2 201861
3 201958
4 202155
5 202045
6 202033
7 20227
8 20196
9 20202
10 20201
11 20201
12 20250
13 20200

About Eva Schöll

Eva Schöll is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Artificial Intelligence, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 13 papers that have together received 355 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Semiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices (10 papers), Photonic and Optical Devices (8 papers), Semiconductor Lasers and Optical Devices (6 papers), Quantum Information and Cryptography (5 papers), Mechanical and Optical Resonators (2 papers), Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (1 paper), Diamond and Carbon-based Materials Research (1 paper) and Advanced Fiber Laser Technologies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (289 citations), Artificial Intelligence (152 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (212 citations), Acoustics and Ultrasonics (2 citations) and Instrumentation (7 citations). Eva Schöll has collaborated with scholars based in Sweden, Germany and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Klaus D. Jöns, Katharina D. Zeuner, Val Zwiller, Thomas Lettner, Lucas Schweickert, Dan Dalacu, Philip J. Poole, Samuel Gyger, Armando Rastelli and Saimon Filipe Covre da Silva. Their work appears in journals such as Nano Letters, Physical Review Letters, ACS Photonics, Nature Communications and Figshare.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact