Eva Ostermayer

16 papers receiving 164 citations

Peers

Eva Ostermayer
Comparison fields: 5 of 31
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 88
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 17
  • Epidemiology 46
  • Infectious Diseases 18
  • Oncology 19
Replace Danielle Howe with:
Danielle Howe Australia
Jessica L. Giordano United States
Adolfo Etchegaray Argentina
Carmel Mullaney Ireland
Danielle Tate United States
Yvonne Gollin United States
Natalia Prodan Germany
E Soncini Italy
Alexandra Letourneau France
Ilaria Fantasia Italy
Eva Ostermayer relative to Danielle Howe Australia Danielle Howe's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.6×
Danielle Howe · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Eva Ostermayer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Eva Ostermayer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eva Ostermayer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eva Ostermayer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Eva Ostermayer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eva Ostermayer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eva Ostermayer. The network helps show where Eva Ostermayer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Eva Ostermayer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Eva Ostermayer Line = papers co-authored together Eva Ostermayer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201333
2 200429
3 201923
4 200922
5 202216
6 202015
7 20238
8 20217
9 20215
10 20215
11 20183
12 20193
13 20072
14 19911
15 20181
16 20161
17
[Prepartal puncture of fetal ovarian cysts--an alternative to ovariectomy in newborn infants?].
19891
18 20090
19 20240
20 20090

About Eva Ostermayer

Eva Ostermayer is a scholar working on Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Surgery, Epidemiology, Obstetrics and Gynecology and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, having authored 21 papers that have together received 175 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics (7 papers), Fetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders (4 papers), Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies (3 papers), Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Studies (3 papers), Congenital Heart Disease Studies (3 papers), Family and Disability Support Research (2 papers), Cardiovascular Issues in Pregnancy (2 papers) and Autopsy Techniques and Outcomes (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (88 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (17 citations), Epidemiology (46 citations), Infectious Diseases (18 citations) and Oncology (19 citations). Eva Ostermayer has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Switzerland and Estonia. Frequent co-authors include Renate Oberhoffer, K. T. M. Schneider, Bettina Kuschel, Javier U. Ortiz, Peter Ewert, Thorsten Fischer, Annette Wacker‐Gussmann, Martina Rudelius, Alexander Kovacevic and Dominik S. Westphal. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Medicine, Ultraschall in der Medizin - European Journal of Ultrasound, Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology and Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact