Eva Janssen

768 citations
29 papers · 581 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Eva Janssen

28 papers receiving 566 citations

Peers

Eva Janssen
Comparison fields: 5 of 105
  • Applied Psychology 133
  • General Decision Sciences 20
  • Dermatology 43
  • Literature and Literary Theory 44
  • Physiology 73
Replace Cora Honing with:
Cora Honing Netherlands
Jessica T. DeFrank United States
Barbara Beach United States
Wendy Nelson United States
Chelsea Moran Canada
Adina Coroiu Canada
Carrie A. Miller United States
Christine Adler Germany
Yuka Akiyama Japan
I.J.T. Veldhuizen Netherlands
Eva Janssen relative to Cora Honing Netherlands Cora Honing's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×19×
Cora Honing · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Eva Janssen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Eva Janssen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eva Janssen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eva Janssen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Eva Janssen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eva Janssen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eva Janssen. The network helps show where Eva Janssen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Eva Janssen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Eva Janssen Line = papers co-authored together Eva Janssen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201090
2 201963
3 201451
4 201249
5 201149
6 201248
7 201333
8 200925
9 201721
10 198021
11 201420
12 201215
13 201515
14 201814
15 201511
16 20129
17 20158
18 20138
19 20185
20 20214

About Eva Janssen

Eva Janssen is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Surgery, Physiology and Infectious Diseases, having authored 29 papers that have together received 581 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Behavioral Health and Interventions (8 papers), Climate Change Communication and Perception (7 papers), Smoking Behavior and Cessation (3 papers), Risk Perception and Management (3 papers), Optimism, Hope, and Well-being (2 papers), Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy (2 papers), Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair (2 papers) and Media Influence and Health (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (133 citations), General Decision Sciences (20 citations), Dermatology (43 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (44 citations) and Physiology (73 citations). Eva Janssen has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Hein de Vries, Liesbeth van Osch, Lilian Lechner, Erika A. Waters, Yasmina Okan, Mirta Galešić, R. Byrick, Math J. J. M. Candel, Robert A. C. Ruiter and Thomas Vogt. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of Health Psychology, Health Education Research, Psychology and Health, Journal of Behavioral Medicine and Journal of Medical Microbiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact