Eva Haker

1.4k citations
15 papers · 930 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Eva Haker

15 papers receiving 836 citations

Peers

Eva Haker
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 342
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 284
  • Rehabilitation 48
  • Cell Biology 121
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 82
Replace J. S. Petrofsky with:
J. S. Petrofsky United States
deVries Ha United States
G C Goats United Kingdom
Eloisa Limonta Italy
Gisela Sj�gaard Denmark
Saied Jalal Aboodarda Canada
Jaan Ereline Estonia
Shigeki Ikegawa Japan
Kuno Hottenrott Germany
Jason M. DeFreitas United States
Eva Haker relative to J. S. Petrofsky United States J. S. Petrofsky's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.9×
J. S. Petrofsky · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Eva Haker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Eva Haker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eva Haker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eva Haker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Eva Haker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eva Haker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eva Haker. The network helps show where Eva Haker may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 13 scholars most cited alongside Eva Haker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Eva Haker Line = papers co-authored together Eva Haker links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 2000243
2 2001123
3 1990100
4 199086
5
A comparative study of continuous ultrasound, placebo ultrasound and rest in epicondylalgia.
198875
6
Lateral epicondylalgia: report of noneffective midlaser treatment.
199164
7 199151
8 200148
9 200246
10
Effect of vibratory stimulation on experimental and clinical pain.
198833
11
Elbow-band, splintage and steroids in lateral epicondylalgia (tennis elbow)
199332
12 199520
13 20204
14 20203
15 20202

About Eva Haker

Eva Haker is a scholar working on Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Cell Biology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Surgery and Complementary and alternative medicine, having authored 15 papers that have together received 930 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Tendon Structure and Treatment (8 papers), Myofascial pain diagnosis and treatment (6 papers), Acupuncture Treatment Research Studies (4 papers), Laser Applications in Dentistry and Medicine (4 papers), Shoulder Injury and Treatment (4 papers), Pain Management and Treatment (1 paper), Bee Products Chemical Analysis (1 paper) and Therapeutic Uses of Natural Elements (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Complementary and alternative medicine (342 citations), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (284 citations), Rehabilitation (48 citations), Cell Biology (121 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (82 citations). Eva Haker has collaborated with scholars based in Sweden and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include Thomas Lundeberg, Peter Bjerring, Henrik Egekvist, Peter Abrahamsson, T Lundeberg, M Britton, Göran Långström, Barbro B. Johansson, Andreas Terént and Kjell Asplund. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, Pain, Clinical Journal of Pain, Stroke and Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact