Eva Häffner

416 citations
7 papers · 322 · h-index 7

Impact in

    • Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity
    • Botany and Plant Ecology Studies
    • Plant Stress Responses and Tolerance
    • Plant Molecular Biology Research
    • Sesquiterpenes and Asteraceae Studies

Papers in

Eva Häffner

7 papers receiving 305 citations

Peers

Eva Häffner
Comparison fields: 5 of 47
  • Plant Science 214
  • Cancer Research 71
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 93
  • Horticulture 3
  • Molecular Biology 106
Replace Jianfeng Huang with:
Jianfeng Huang China
María Ángeles Ortiz Herrera Spain
Sung Soo Whang South Korea
Jimi Naoki Nakajima Brazil
Emanuele Del Guacchio Italy
Вадим Шаров Russia
Robert L. Wilbur United States
Dean G. Kelch United States
Ernst Vitek Austria
Georgy Lazkov Kyrgyzstan
Eva Häffner relative to Jianfeng Huang China Jianfeng Huang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Jianfeng Huang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Eva Häffner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Eva Häffner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eva Häffner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eva Häffner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Eva Häffner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eva Häffner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eva Häffner. The network helps show where Eva Häffner may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 8 scholars most cited alongside Eva Häffner, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Eva Häffner Line = papers co-authored together Eva Häffner links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

7 of 7 papers shown

About Eva Häffner

Eva Häffner is a scholar working on Plant Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Cancer Research, Ecology and Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, having authored 7 papers that have together received 322 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity (3 papers), Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (2 papers), Botany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies (2 papers), Sesquiterpenes and Asteraceae Studies (2 papers), Urban Green Space and Health (1 paper), Lichen and fungal ecology (1 paper), Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (1 paper) and Bryophyte Studies and Records (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Plant Science (214 citations), Cancer Research (71 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (93 citations), Horticulture (3 citations) and Molecular Biology (106 citations). Eva Häffner has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Slovenia and Czechia. Frequent co-authors include Elke Diederichsen, Frank H. Hellwig, Petr Karlovský, Richard Splivallo, Hardy Pfanz, Franc Batič, Sibylle Schroer and Franz Hölker. Their work appears in journals such as BMC Plant Biology, Plants, Water Air & Soil Pollution, Willdenowia - Annals of the Botanic Garden and Botanical Museum Berlin-Dahlem and DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact