Eugene Thacker
Impact in
- Cultural Studies top 2%
- Posthumanist Ethics and Activism
- Gothic Literature and Media Analysis
-
- Art, Technology, and Culture
Papers in
-
- Cybernetics and Technology in Society 17
- Philosophy 19
- Philosophical and Cultural Analysis 13
- Co-authors
- Alexander R. Galloway (7 shared papers)McKenzie Wark (1 shared paper)Geert Lovink (1 shared paper)Yves Citton (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Leonardo (3 papers)Angelaki (2 papers)Theory Culture & Society (2 papers)Configurations (2 papers)Grey Room (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Eugene Thacker
45 papers receiving 265 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
- Cultural Studies 90
- Visual Arts and Performing Arts 56
- Philosophy 77
- Communication 37
- History and Philosophy of Science 37
Countries citing papers authored by Eugene Thacker
This map shows the geographic impact of Eugene Thacker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eugene Thacker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eugene Thacker more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Eugene Thacker
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eugene Thacker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eugene Thacker. The network helps show where Eugene Thacker may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 4 scholars most cited alongside Eugene Thacker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 53 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2003 | 59 | |
| 2 | 2010 | 52 | |
| 3 | In the Dust of This Planet | 2011 | 28 |
| 4 | 2009 | 27 | |
| 5 | 2004 | 24 | |
| 6 | 2003 | 22 | |
| 7 | 2001 | 20 | |
| 8 | 2013 | 17 | |
| 9 | 2006 | 16 | |
| 10 | 2008 | 16 | |
| 11 | Leper Creativity: Cyclonopedia Symposium | 2012 | 14 |
| 12 | 1999 | 9 | |
| 13 | Networks, Swarms, Multitudes (Part One) | 2004 | 9 |
| 14 | 2011 | 9 | |
| 15 | .../visible_human.html/digital anatomy and the hyper-texted body | 1998 | 5 |
| 16 | 2009 | 5 | |
| 17 | 2012 | 5 | |
| 18 | 2019 | 5 | |
| 19 | 2002 | 4 | |
| 20 | 2012 | 4 |
About Eugene Thacker
Eugene Thacker is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Philosophy, Cultural Studies, Communication and Visual Arts and Performing Arts, having authored 53 papers that have together received 402 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cybernetics and Technology in Society (17 papers), Philosophical and Cultural Analysis (13 papers), Bioethics and Human Rights Issues (8 papers), Gothic Literature and Media Analysis (5 papers), Cultural Studies and Postmodernism (5 papers), Contemporary Social and Educational Issues (5 papers), Posthumanist Ethics and Activism (4 papers) and Art, Technology, and Culture (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cultural Studies (90 citations), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (56 citations), Philosophy (77 citations), Communication (37 citations) and History and Philosophy of Science (37 citations). Eugene Thacker has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Alexander R. Galloway, McKenzie Wark, Geert Lovink and Yves Citton. Their work appears in journals such as Leonardo, Angelaki, Theory Culture & Society, Configurations and Grey Room.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.