Eugene Thacker
Impact in
-
- Geographies of human-animal interactions
- Cultural Studies top 2%
- Posthumanist Ethics and Activism
- Gothic Literature and Media Analysis
Papers in
-
- Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices 3
- Utopian, Dystopian, and Speculative Fiction 2
- Co-authors
- Alexander R. Galloway (7 shared papers)McKenzie Wark (1 shared paper)Yves Citton (1 shared paper)Geert Lovink (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Leonardo (5 papers)Configurations (2 papers)Angelaki (2 papers)Theory Culture & Society (2 papers)Grey Room (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesNetherlandsUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Eugene Thacker
47 papers receiving 285 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
- Geography, Planning and Development 77
- Cultural Studies 95
- Visual Arts and Performing Arts 31
- Philosophy 68
- Literature and Literary Theory 56
Countries citing papers authored by Eugene Thacker
This map shows the geographic impact of Eugene Thacker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eugene Thacker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eugene Thacker more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Eugene Thacker
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eugene Thacker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eugene Thacker. The network helps show where Eugene Thacker may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 4 scholars most cited alongside Eugene Thacker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 55 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2003 | 61 | |
| 2 | 2010 | 58 | |
| 3 | In the Dust of This Planet | 2011 | 30 |
| 4 | 2004 | 28 | |
| 5 | 2009 | 27 | |
| 6 | 2003 | 23 | |
| 7 | 2001 | 20 | |
| 8 | 2006 | 17 | |
| 9 | 2008 | 16 | |
| 10 | 2013 | 15 | |
| 11 | Leper Creativity: Cyclonopedia Symposium | 2012 | 14 |
| 12 | Networks, Swarms, Multitudes (Part One) | 2004 | 9 |
| 13 | 1999 | 9 | |
| 14 | 2011 | 8 | |
| 15 | .../visible_human.html/digital anatomy and the hyper-texted body | 1998 | 5 |
| 16 | 2012 | 5 | |
| 17 | 2009 | 5 | |
| 18 | 2019 | 5 | |
| 19 | 2009 | 4 | |
| 20 | 2002 | 4 |
About Eugene Thacker
Eugene Thacker is a scholar working on Philosophy, History and Philosophy of Science, Sociology and Political Science, Cognitive Neuroscience and Molecular Biology, having authored 55 papers that have together received 421 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Science Education and Perceptions (3 papers), Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations (3 papers), Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices (3 papers), Innovation, Technology, and Society (2 papers), Gothic Literature and Media Analysis (2 papers), Sociology and Education Studies (2 papers), Modular Robots and Swarm Intelligence (2 papers) and Utopian, Dystopian, and Speculative Fiction (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geography, Planning and Development (77 citations), Cultural Studies (95 citations), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (31 citations), Philosophy (68 citations) and Literature and Literary Theory (56 citations). Eugene Thacker has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Alexander R. Galloway, McKenzie Wark, Yves Citton and Geert Lovink. Their work appears in journals such as Leonardo, Configurations, Angelaki, Theory Culture & Society and Grey Room.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.