Eugene P. Scheide

529 citations
15 papers · 375 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Eugene P. Scheide

15 papers receiving 303 citations

Peers

Eugene P. Scheide
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
  • Bioengineering 124
  • Biomedical Engineering 258
  • Electrochemistry 25
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 186
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 62
Replace Qi Kang with:
Qi Kang China
Jianhong Pei Hong Kong
Tamao Odake Japan
Mark. Klusty United States
Hiroyuki Miyagi Japan
Messaoud Benounis Algeria
H. Jehring Germany
J. Mayer Poland
D. W. Anthon United States
Mo Yang Taiwan
Eugene P. Scheide relative to Qi Kang China Qi Kang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Qi Kang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Eugene P. Scheide

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Eugene P. Scheide's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eugene P. Scheide with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eugene P. Scheide more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Eugene P. Scheide

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eugene P. Scheide. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eugene P. Scheide. The network helps show where Eugene P. Scheide may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 5 scholars most cited alongside Eugene P. Scheide, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Eugene P. Scheide Line = papers co-authored together Eugene P. Scheide links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 198868
2 197256
3 198845
4 197443
5 197835
6 197526
7 197021
8 198119
9 198218
10 196817
11 19779
12 19778
13 19716
14 19792
15 19702

About Eugene P. Scheide

Eugene P. Scheide is a scholar working on Biomedical Engineering, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Bioengineering, Organic Chemistry and Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, having authored 15 papers that have together received 375 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Acoustic Wave Resonator Technologies (6 papers), Gas Sensing Nanomaterials and Sensors (5 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Sensors (4 papers), Organophosphorus compounds synthesis (3 papers), Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies (2 papers), Electrochemical Analysis and Applications (2 papers), Advanced MEMS and NEMS Technologies (1 paper) and Chemical Synthesis and Characterization (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Bioengineering (124 citations), Biomedical Engineering (258 citations), Electrochemistry (25 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (186 citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (62 citations). Eugene P. Scheide has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Singapore. Frequent co-authors include George G. Guilbault, John K. Taylor, James M. Jordan, Mat H. Ho and Richard A. Durst. Their work appears in journals such as American Industrial Hygiene Association Journal, Analytical Chemistry, The Journal of Physical Chemistry, Environmental Science & Technology and Analytical Letters.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact