Ernst Lohmeyer

450 citations
12 papers · 133 · h-index 6

Impact in

    • Biblical Studies and Interpretation
    • Theology and Canon Law Studies
    • Pentecostalism and Christianity Studies
    • Christian Theology and Mission
    • Contemporary Christian Leadership and Education
  • Archeology top 5%
    • Archaeology and Historical Studies

Papers in

    • Biblical Studies and Interpretation 5
    • Theology and Canon Law Studies 3
    • Religion, Theology, and Education 1
    • Historical, Literary, and Cultural Studies 2
    • Byzantine Studies and History 1
Journals
Journal of Biblical Literature (1 paper)Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht eBooks (6 papers)Harper & Row eBooks (1 paper)Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft eBooks (1 paper)

In The Last Decade

Ernst Lohmeyer

10 papers receiving 59 citations

Peers

Ernst Lohmeyer
Comparison fields: 5 of 26
  • Religious studies 107
  • Archeology 44
  • Classics 13
  • Development 8
  • Philosophy 13
Replace W. C. van Unnik with:
W. C. van Unnik Netherlands
Günther Bornkamm
Paul Billerbeck
Henry J. Cadbury United States
Jürgen Roloff Germany
Georg Strecker United States
Jacob Jervell Norway
Birger Pearson
Harry M. Orlinsky
Carey A. Moore United States
Ernst Lohmeyer relative to W. C. van Unnik Netherlands W. C. van Unnik's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
W. C. van Unnik · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ernst Lohmeyer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ernst Lohmeyer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ernst Lohmeyer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ernst Lohmeyer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ernst Lohmeyer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ernst Lohmeyer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ernst Lohmeyer. The network helps show where Ernst Lohmeyer may publish in the future.

No co-authors to show.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
#Work
1 196742
2
Das Evangelium des Matthäus
195624
3
Kyrios Jesus : eine Untersuchung zu Phil. 2, 5-11
196117
4
Die Briefe an die Philipper, an die Kolosser und an Philemon
196416
5
Der Brief an die Philipper
195310
6
Kritisch-exegetischer Kommentar über das Neue Testament
19569
7
Lord's Prayer
19655
8 19533
9
Das Vater=Unser
19522
10
Our Father : an introduction to the Lord's prayer
19652
11 19632
12
Die Briefe an die Kolosser und an Philemon
19611

About Ernst Lohmeyer

Ernst Lohmeyer is a scholar working on Religious studies, Classics, Sociology and Political Science, Law and History, having authored 12 papers that have together received 133 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Biblical Studies and Interpretation (5 papers), Theology and Canon Law Studies (3 papers), Historical, Literary, and Cultural Studies (2 papers), European Law and Migration (1 paper), Byzantine Studies and History (1 paper), Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (1 paper), Religion, Theology, and Education (1 paper) and Classical Studies and Legal History (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Religious studies (107 citations), Archeology (44 citations), Classics (13 citations), Development (8 citations) and Philosophy (13 citations). Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Biblical Literature, Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht eBooks, Harper & Row eBooks and Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft eBooks.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact