Erik Steur

851 citations
52 papers · 613 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Erik Steur

51 papers receiving 592 citations

Peers

Erik Steur
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 238
  • Computer Networks and Communications 323
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 162
  • Control and Systems Engineering 133
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 35
Replace Zhaoyang Huang with:
Zhaoyang Huang China
Marian Anghel United States
Simona Olmi Italy
Alicia d’Anjou Spain
Andreas Sorge Germany
Judith Lehnert Germany
Patrycja Jaros Poland
Robert Tchitnga Cameroon
B. Nana Cameroon
Yubing Gong China
Erik Steur relative to Zhaoyang Huang China Zhaoyang Huang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Zhaoyang Huang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Erik Steur

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Erik Steur's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Erik Steur with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Erik Steur more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Erik Steur

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Erik Steur. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Erik Steur. The network helps show where Erik Steur may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Erik Steur, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Erik Steur Line = papers co-authored together Erik Steur links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 52 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009107
2 201366
3 201748
4 201146
5 201027
6 201226
7 201723
8 201419
9 201415
10 200915
11 200815
12 201014
13 201713
14 201612
15 201610
16 20159
17
Parameter estimation in Hindmarsh-Rose neurons
20069
18 20229
19 20189
20 20248

About Erik Steur

Erik Steur is a scholar working on Computer Networks and Communications, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Cognitive Neuroscience, Control and Systems Engineering and Molecular Biology, having authored 52 papers that have together received 613 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nonlinear Dynamics and Pattern Formation (28 papers), stochastic dynamics and bifurcation (20 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (16 papers), Neural Networks Stability and Synchronization (14 papers), Gene Regulatory Network Analysis (9 papers), Advanced Control Systems Optimization (5 papers), Adaptive Control of Nonlinear Systems (4 papers) and Stability and Controllability of Differential Equations (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (238 citations), Computer Networks and Communications (323 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (162 citations), Control and Systems Engineering (133 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (35 citations). Erik Steur has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Belgium and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Henk Nijmeijer, Ivan Tyukin, Cees van Leeuwen, Rutger A. van Santen, Nathan van de Wouw, Alexey Pavlov, Chris Trengove, Toshiki Oguchi, Maarten Merkx and Wouter Engelen. Their work appears in journals such as Automatica, International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos, International Journal of Neural Systems, Lab on a Chip and Physica D Nonlinear Phenomena.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact