Erik Steur

868 citations
52 papers · 625 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Erik Steur

51 papers receiving 606 citations

Peers

Erik Steur
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 241
  • Computer Networks and Communications 327
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 164
  • Control and Systems Engineering 134
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 33
Replace Zhaoyang Huang with:
Zhaoyang Huang China
Simona Olmi Italy
Alicia d’Anjou Spain
Robert Tchitnga Cameroon
B. Nana Cameroon
Patrycja Jaros Poland
Andreas Sorge Germany
Chengjie Chen China
Ana Paula S. Dias Portugal
Yubing Gong China
Erik Steur relative to Zhaoyang Huang China Zhaoyang Huang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.5×
Zhaoyang Huang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Erik Steur

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Erik Steur's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Erik Steur with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Erik Steur more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Erik Steur

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Erik Steur. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Erik Steur. The network helps show where Erik Steur may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Erik Steur, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Erik Steur Line = papers co-authored together Erik Steur links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 52 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009109
2 201366
3 201749
4 201146
5 201027
6 201226
7 201723
8 201419
9 201015
10 201415
11 200815
12 200915
13 201714
14 201613
15 201610
16 20189
17 20159
18
Parameter estimation in Hindmarsh-Rose neurons
20069
19 20249
20 20229

About Erik Steur

Erik Steur is a scholar working on Computer Networks and Communications, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Cognitive Neuroscience, Control and Systems Engineering and Molecular Biology, having authored 52 papers that have together received 625 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nonlinear Dynamics and Pattern Formation (28 papers), stochastic dynamics and bifurcation (20 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (16 papers), Neural Networks Stability and Synchronization (14 papers), Gene Regulatory Network Analysis (9 papers), Advanced Control Systems Optimization (5 papers), Adaptive Control of Nonlinear Systems (4 papers) and Stability and Controllability of Differential Equations (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (241 citations), Computer Networks and Communications (327 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (164 citations), Control and Systems Engineering (134 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (33 citations). Erik Steur has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Belgium and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Henk Nijmeijer, Ivan Tyukin, Cees van Leeuwen, Rutger A. van Santen, Nathan van de Wouw, Alexey Pavlov, Chris Trengove, Toshiki Oguchi, Alex Joesaar and Tom F. A. de Greef. Their work appears in journals such as Automatica, International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos, Lab on a Chip, Chaos An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science and International Journal of Neural Systems.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact