Eric Scharff

974 citations
12 papers · 777 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Eric Scharff

11 papers receiving 670 citations

Peers

Eric Scharff
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
  • Human-Computer Interaction 312
  • Computer Science Applications 165
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 106
  • Communication 86
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 127
Replace Hal Eden with:
Hal Eden United States
Jonathan Ostwald United States
Ernesto G. Arias United States
Till Schümmer Germany
Dan Shapiro United Kingdom
Jim Hollan United States
Anicia Peters Namibia
Milene Selbach Silveira Brazil
Ebba Þóra Hvannberg Iceland
Dennis C. Neale United States
Eric Scharff relative to Hal Eden United States Hal Eden's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Hal Eden · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Eric Scharff

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Eric Scharff's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eric Scharff with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eric Scharff more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Eric Scharff

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eric Scharff. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eric Scharff. The network helps show where Eric Scharff may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 9 scholars most cited alongside Eric Scharff, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Eric Scharff Line = papers co-authored together Eric Scharff links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
#Work
1 2000398
2 2000116
3 199892
4 200470
5 200237
6 199926
7
Open source: a conceptual framework for collaborative artifact and knowledge construction
200215
8
In MY sistuation I would dislike THAAAT! - Role Play as Assessment Method Tools Supporting Participatory Planning
200211
9 20029
10 20022
11 20021
12 20230

About Eric Scharff

Eric Scharff is a scholar working on Human-Computer Interaction, Management of Technology and Innovation, Computer Science Applications, Communication and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 12 papers that have together received 777 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Usability and User Interface Design (6 papers), Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (5 papers), Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development (5 papers), Open Source Software Innovations (4 papers), Wikis in Education and Collaboration (3 papers), Interactive and Immersive Displays (2 papers), Open Education and E-Learning (2 papers) and Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (312 citations), Computer Science Applications (165 citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (106 citations), Communication (86 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (127 citations). Eric Scharff has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Gerhard Fischer, Hal Eden, Andrew Gorman, Ernesto G. Arias, Yunwen Ye, Gerhard Fischer, Eva Hornecker, Vanessa Lucena Empinotti and Shin’ichi Konomi. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Interactive Media in Education, ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, Participatory Design Conference and The MIT Press eBooks.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact