Eric Osborn

1.0k citations
21 papers · 133 · h-index 8

Impact in

    • Biblical Studies and Interpretation
    • Theology and Canon Law Studies
  • Classics top 5%
    • Byzantine Studies and History

Papers in

    • Theology and Canon Law Studies 11
    • Biblical Studies and Interpretation 6
    • Classical Studies and Legal History 4
    • Historical and Religious Studies of Rome 4

Eric Osborn

15 papers receiving 73 citations

Peers

Eric Osborn
Comparison fields: 5 of 33
  • Religious studies 62
  • Classics 33
  • Philosophy 49
  • Archeology 36
  • History 32
Replace Manlio Simonetti with:
Manlio Simonetti Italy
Gail Paterson Corrington United States
G. J. M. Bartelink Netherlands
Paul M. Blowers United States
Alois Grillmeier United Kingdom
Lewis Ayres United Kingdom
François Bovon Switzerland
Pauline Allen Australia
Robert E. Sinkewicz
John C. Lamoreaux United States
Eric Osborn relative to Manlio Simonetti Italy Manlio Simonetti's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Manlio Simonetti · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Eric Osborn

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Eric Osborn's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eric Osborn with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eric Osborn more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Eric Osborn

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eric Osborn. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eric Osborn. The network helps show where Eric Osborn may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 2 scholars most cited alongside Eric Osborn, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Eric Osborn Line = papers co-authored together Eric Osborn links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199733
2 200118
3
Irenaeus of Lyons
200115
4 199311
5 197611
6 195910
7 19818
8 19597
9 19947
10 19983
11 20052
12 19982
13 20061
14 20031
15 20001
16 19771
17
Philo and Clement: Quiet conversion and noetic exegesis
19981
18 20011
19
The Philosophy Of Clement Of Alexandria
20110
20 19950

About Eric Osborn

Eric Osborn is a scholar working on Religious studies, History, Classics, Philosophy and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 21 papers that have together received 133 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Theology and Canon Law Studies (11 papers), Byzantine Studies and History (7 papers), Medieval Philosophy and Theology (6 papers), Biblical Studies and Interpretation (6 papers), Classical Studies and Legal History (4 papers), Augustinian Studies and Theology (4 papers), Historical and Religious Studies of Rome (4 papers) and Classical Antiquity Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Religious studies (62 citations), Classics (33 citations), Philosophy (49 citations), Archeology (36 citations) and History (32 citations). Eric Osborn has collaborated with scholars based in Australia. Frequent co-authors include J. C. M. van Winden and David E. Aune. Their work appears in journals such as Vigiliae Christianae, The Expository Times, The Journal of Theological Studies, Journal of Biblical Literature and The Philosophical Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact