Eric M. Haas
Impact in
Papers in
- Co-authors
- Madhu Ragupathi (24 shared papers)Diego I. Ramos‐Valadez (14 shared papers)Chirag B. Patel (15 shared papers)Thomas J. Dishion (3 shared papers)Deborah S. Keller (20 shared papers)T. Bartley Pickron (11 shared papers)François Poulin (1 shared paper)Rodrigo Pedraza (13 shared papers)
- Journals
- Surgical Endoscopy (19 papers)Diseases of the Colon & Rectum (8 papers)The American Journal of Surgery (5 papers)Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery (4 papers)Journal of Surgical Research (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustriaSwitzerland
In The Last Decade
Eric M. Haas
85 papers receiving 2.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 113
- Surgery 1.2k
- Oncology 695
- Gastroenterology 99
- Clinical Psychology 218
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 47
Countries citing papers authored by Eric M. Haas
This map shows the geographic impact of Eric M. Haas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eric M. Haas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eric M. Haas more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Eric M. Haas
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eric M. Haas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eric M. Haas. The network helps show where Eric M. Haas may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Eric M. Haas, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 91 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2010 | 339 | |
| 2 | 1997 | 162 | |
| 3 | 2012 | 128 | |
| 4 | The Peer Influence Paradox: Friendship Quality and Deviancy Training Within Male Adolescent Friendships. | 1999 | 128 |
| 5 | 2021 | 111 | |
| 6 | 2010 | 102 | |
| 7 | 2003 | 69 | |
| 8 | 2011 | 60 | |
| 9 | 2015 | 60 | |
| 10 | 2006 | 56 | |
| 11 | 2011 | 55 | |
| 12 | 2010 | 49 | |
| 13 | 2015 | 45 | |
| 14 | 2011 | 38 | |
| 15 | 2016 | 37 | |
| 16 | 2010 | 36 | |
| 17 | 2011 | 36 | |
| 18 | 2014 | 34 | |
| 19 | 2011 | 34 | |
| 20 | 2013 | 33 |
About Eric M. Haas
Eric M. Haas is a scholar working on Surgery, Oncology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Rheumatology and Gastroenterology, having authored 91 papers that have together received 2.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments (24 papers), Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques (23 papers), Diverticular Disease and Complications (13 papers), Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (6 papers), Surgical Simulation and Training (5 papers), Pelvic floor disorders treatments (5 papers), Hernia repair and management (4 papers) and Anesthesia and Pain Management (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Surgery (1.2k citations), Oncology (695 citations), Gastroenterology (99 citations), Clinical Psychology (218 citations) and Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (47 citations). Eric M. Haas has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Austria and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Madhu Ragupathi, Diego I. Ramos‐Valadez, Chirag B. Patel, Thomas J. Dishion, Deborah S. Keller, T. Bartley Pickron, François Poulin, Rodrigo Pedraza, Fuzhong Li and J. Mark Eddy. Their work appears in journals such as Surgical Endoscopy, Diseases of the Colon & Rectum, The American Journal of Surgery, Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery and Journal of Surgical Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.