Eric Kim

28 papers receiving 389 citations

Peers

Eric Kim
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 84
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 66
  • Control and Systems Engineering 66
  • Artificial Intelligence 94
  • Civil and Structural Engineering 58
Replace Chuliang Wei with:
Chuliang Wei China
Stanley Chien United States
Canqian Yang China
Amir Mosavi Hungary
Abhay Kumar India
Hongfeng Li China
Jan Lundgren Sweden
Elene Firmeza Ohata Brazil
Zelong Liu China
Larry E. Banta United States
Eric Kim relative to Chuliang Wei China Chuliang Wei's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.4×
Chuliang Wei · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Eric Kim

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Eric Kim's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eric Kim with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eric Kim more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Eric Kim

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eric Kim. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eric Kim. The network helps show where Eric Kim may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Eric Kim, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Eric Kim Line = papers co-authored together Eric Kim links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201859
2 201256
3 201954
4 201344
5 201829
6 202229
7 201620
8 201918
9 201714
10 201910
11 20229
12 20127
13 20246
14 20186
15
Operator-assisted tabulation of optical scan ballots
20126
16 20245
17 20225
18
An analysis of write-in marks on optical scan ballots
20114
19 20224
20 20232

About Eric Kim

Eric Kim is a scholar working on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Artificial Intelligence, Social Psychology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Surgery, having authored 31 papers that have together received 401 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (4 papers), Lymphadenopathy Diagnosis and Analysis (3 papers), Digital Media Forensic Detection (3 papers), Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging (3 papers), MRI in cancer diagnosis (2 papers), Advanced Steganography and Watermarking Techniques (2 papers), AI in cancer detection (2 papers) and Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (84 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (66 citations), Control and Systems Engineering (66 citations), Artificial Intelligence (94 citations) and Civil and Structural Engineering (58 citations). Eric Kim has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Tian Ran Lin, Andy Tan, Leslie J. Struble, Lauren Y. Gómez-Zamorano, Linda Moy, Charles Rosenberg, Jure Leskovec, Stacey Wolfson, Wang-Cheng Kang and Julian McAuley. Their work appears in journals such as Radiology, Health Psychology, Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, Journal of Community Psychology and Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact