E.O. Field

903 citations
44 papers · 781 · h-index 15

Impact in

  • Cell Biology top 10%
    • Hemoglobin structure and function
    • Microtubule and mitosis dynamics
  • Hematology top 10%
    • Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Papers in

E.O. Field

40 papers receiving 597 citations

Peers

E.O. Field
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
  • Cell Biology 127
  • Hematology 105
  • Modeling and Simulation 38
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 132
  • Toxicology 22
Replace Hywel Madoc‐Jones with:
Hywel Madoc‐Jones United States
E.P. Cronkite United States
Sven-Åge Killmann Denmark
Leonard F. Lamerton United Kingdom
Dennis W. Ross United States
Gerald C. Easty United Kingdom
R. J. Berry United Kingdom
Anthony H.W. Nias United Kingdom
K.B. Dawson United Kingdom
Wilf Levin Canada
E.O. Field relative to Hywel Madoc‐Jones United States Hywel Madoc‐Jones's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×3.5×
Hywel Madoc‐Jones · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by E.O. Field

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of E.O. Field's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E.O. Field with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E.O. Field more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by E.O. Field

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by E.O. Field. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E.O. Field. The network helps show where E.O. Field may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside E.O. Field, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with E.O. Field Line = papers co-authored together E.O. Field links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 44 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1955113
2 1965101
3 197081
4 195546
5 196643
6 196839
7 197239
8 197030
9 196825
10 196823
11 195921
12 196620
13 196519
14
Reduced sensitivity of F-1 hybrid rats to re-challenge with parental strain spleen cells.
196618
15 196217
16 195415
17 196512
18 196712
19 196912
20 195610

About E.O. Field

E.O. Field is a scholar working on Hematology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Cell Biology, Immunology and Radiation, having authored 44 papers that have together received 781 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (7 papers), T-cell and B-cell Immunology (6 papers), Effects of Radiation Exposure (6 papers), Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (4 papers), Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications (3 papers), Microtubule and mitosis dynamics (3 papers), Cancer therapeutics and mechanisms (2 papers) and Radioactive Decay and Measurement Techniques (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cell Biology (127 citations), Hematology (105 citations), Modeling and Simulation (38 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (132 citations) and Toxicology (22 citations). E.O. Field has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include K.B. Dawson, John Richard O'Brien, K. Hellmann, HEATHER B. A. SHARPE, Hywel Madoc‐Jones, Alexander George Ogston, D. W. Smithers, D. F. Tucker, N. M. Blackett and G. W. Dolphin. Their work appears in journals such as The Lancet, Nature, British Journal of Radiology, Transplantation and Blood.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact