En‐Ting Wu

2.8k citations
124 papers · 1.8k · h-index 25

Impact in

Papers in

En‐Ting Wu

116 papers receiving 1.8k citations

Peers

En‐Ting Wu
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
  • Emergency Medicine 155
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 462
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 301
  • Epidemiology 434
  • Surgery 515
Replace Peter Van Trigt with:
Peter Van Trigt United States
Michiaki Imamura United States
Bernard Cholley France
Louis A. Brunsting United States
Ingo Dähnert Germany
Christian Balmer Switzerland
R. Scott Stuart United States
Eric S. Nussbaum United States
Anthony R.C. Dobell Canada
John W. Brown United States
En‐Ting Wu relative to Peter Van Trigt United States Peter Van Trigt's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.6×
Peter Van Trigt · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by En‐Ting Wu

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of En‐Ting Wu's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by En‐Ting Wu with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites En‐Ting Wu more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by En‐Ting Wu

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by En‐Ting Wu. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by En‐Ting Wu. The network helps show where En‐Ting Wu may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside En‐Ting Wu, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with En‐Ting Wu Line = papers co-authored together En‐Ting Wu links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 124 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200897
2 201389
3 200187
4 201568
5
Multiple sclerosis. Interactions between oligodendrocytes and hypertrophic astrocytes and their occurrence in other, nondemyelinating conditions.
199268
6 201264
7 201263
8 201461
9 200659
10 200751
11 200947
12 200745
13 200741
14 200538
15 200733
16 201231
17 200630
18 201228
19 200526
20 201726

About En‐Ting Wu

En‐Ting Wu is a scholar working on Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Epidemiology, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 124 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Congenital Heart Disease Studies (28 papers), Tracheal and airway disorders (15 papers), Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices (14 papers), Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Studies (12 papers), Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair (7 papers), Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (5 papers), Neonatal Respiratory Health Research (5 papers) and Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Emergency Medicine (155 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (462 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (301 citations), Epidemiology (434 citations) and Surgery (515 citations). En‐Ting Wu has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan, China and United States. Frequent co-authors include Mei‐Hwan Wu, Shu‐Chien Huang, Jou‐Kou Wang, Yih‐Sharng Chen, Chung‐I Chang, Ching‐Chia Wang, Ming‐Tai Lin, Ing‐Sh Chiu, Shuenn‐Nan Chiu and Wen‐Je Ko. Their work appears in journals such as The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, Pediatric Pulmonology, International Journal of Cardiology, European Journal of Pediatrics and The Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact