Enis Cela
Impact in
- Obstetrics and Gynecology top 5%
- Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
- Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
- Reproductive Medicine top 5%
- Ovarian function and disorders
- Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
Papers in
-
- Ovarian function and disorders 4
- Sperm and Testicular Function 1
-
- Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy 2
- Birth, Development, and Health 1
- Co-authors
- Mark I. McCarthy (7 shared papers)Eleni Κousta (7 shared papers)Stephen Franks (4 shared papers)Davinia White (4 shared papers)Umberto Nicolini (1 shared paper)Desmond G. Johnston (4 shared papers)Anna Penny (4 shared papers)Barbara A. Millauer (4 shared papers)
- Journals
- Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey (2 papers)Clinical Endocrinology (2 papers)Diabetologia (1 paper)American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (1 paper)Human Reproduction (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomItalyAlbania
In The Last Decade
Enis Cela
9 papers receiving 403 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
- Obstetrics and Gynecology 144
- Reproductive Medicine 160
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 101
- Urology 29
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 103
Countries citing papers authored by Enis Cela
This map shows the geographic impact of Enis Cela's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Enis Cela with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Enis Cela more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Enis Cela
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Enis Cela. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Enis Cela. The network helps show where Enis Cela may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Enis Cela, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1999 | 84 | |
| 2 | 1998 | 69 | |
| 3 | 2000 | 69 | |
| 4 | 2003 | 62 | |
| 5 | 2005 | 58 | |
| 6 | 2003 | 57 | |
| 7 | 2022 | 21 | |
| 8 | 2000 | 7 | |
| 9 | 2001 | 4 |
About Enis Cela
Enis Cela is a scholar working on Reproductive Medicine, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, having authored 9 papers that have together received 431 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ovarian function and disorders (4 papers), Gestational Diabetes Research and Management (3 papers), Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy (2 papers), Reproductive Biology and Fertility (2 papers), Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management (1 paper), Sperm and Testicular Function (1 paper) and Birth, Development, and Health (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (144 citations), Reproductive Medicine (160 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (101 citations), Urology (29 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (103 citations). Enis Cela has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Italy and Albania. Frequent co-authors include Mark I. McCarthy, Eleni Κousta, Stephen Franks, Davinia White, Umberto Nicolini, Desmond G. Johnston, Anna Penny, Barbara A. Millauer, Natasha Lawrence and Helen Wilson. Their work appears in journals such as Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey, Clinical Endocrinology, Diabetologia, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Human Reproduction.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.