Enea Ceolini

2.1k citations
28 papers · 1.1k · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Enea Ceolini

27 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

Enea Ceolini
Comparison fields: 5 of 108
  • Signal Processing 255
  • Health Informatics 28
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 268
  • Artificial Intelligence 464
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 161
Replace Mohammad-Parsa Hosseini with:
Mohammad-Parsa Hosseini United States
Yinan Kong Australia
Aboozar Taherkhani United Kingdom
Sumantra Dutta Roy India
Changde Du China
Mohammad I. Daoud Jordan
Bob L. Sturm Denmark
Yifan Xu China
Mitul Kumar Ahirwal India
Sebastian Bosse Germany
Enea Ceolini relative to Mohammad-Parsa Hosseini United States Mohammad-Parsa Hosseini's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×3.5×
Mohammad-Parsa Hosseini · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Enea Ceolini

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Enea Ceolini's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Enea Ceolini with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Enea Ceolini more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Enea Ceolini

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Enea Ceolini. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Enea Ceolini. The network helps show where Enea Ceolini may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Enea Ceolini, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Enea Ceolini Line = papers co-authored together Enea Ceolini links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2018180
2 2019155
3 2020136
4 2018110
5 201892
6 201987
7 202057
8 201955
9 201747
10 201816
11 201815
12 201913
13 202112
14 201712
15 201910
16 20229
17 20228
18 20207
19 20257
20 20196

About Enea Ceolini

Enea Ceolini is a scholar working on Signal Processing, Cognitive Neuroscience, Artificial Intelligence, Computational Mechanics and Electrical and Electronic Engineering, having authored 28 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Speech and Audio Processing (12 papers), Music and Audio Processing (8 papers), Speech Recognition and Synthesis (5 papers), EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (5 papers), Advanced Adaptive Filtering Techniques (4 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (4 papers), Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) (3 papers) and Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Signal Processing (255 citations), Health Informatics (28 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (268 citations), Artificial Intelligence (464 citations) and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (161 citations). Enea Ceolini has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, Netherlands and France. Frequent co-authors include Marco Ancona, Markus Groß, Cengiz Öztireli, Shih‐Chii Liu, Tobi Delbrück, Daniel Neil, Daniel D.E. Wong, Nima Mesgarani, Elisa Donati and Jens Hjortkjær. Their work appears in journals such as iScience, Frontiers in Neuroscience, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, NeuroImage and npj Digital Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact