Endijs Bāders
Impact in
-
- Forest ecology and management
- Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
- Insect Science top 5%
- Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies
Papers in
-
- Forest ecology and management 17
- Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies 4
-
- Forest Management and Policy 8
- Co-authors
- Āris Jansons (26 shared papers)Didzis Elferts (10 shared papers)Jānis Donis (8 shared papers)Kalev Jõgiste (7 shared papers)Floortje Vodde (6 shared papers)Tiit Maaten (2 shared papers)Henn Korjus (2 shared papers)Vitas Marozas (2 shared papers)
In The Last Decade
Endijs Bāders
24 papers receiving 234 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 41
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 135
- Insect Science 100
- Global and Planetary Change 134
- Ecology 55
- Atmospheric Science 30
Countries citing papers authored by Endijs Bāders
This map shows the geographic impact of Endijs Bāders's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Endijs Bāders with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Endijs Bāders more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Endijs Bāders
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Endijs Bāders. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Endijs Bāders. The network helps show where Endijs Bāders may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Endijs Bāders, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2017 | 84 | |
| 2 | 2018 | 25 | |
| 3 | 2018 | 22 | |
| 4 | 2021 | 14 | |
| 5 | 2018 | 12 | |
| 6 | 2019 | 11 | |
| 7 | Relationships of height growth of lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta var. latifolia) and Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) with climatic factors in Zvirgzde, Latvia. | 2013 | 10 |
| 8 | 2022 | 9 | |
| 9 | 2020 | 8 | |
| 10 | 2018 | 7 | |
| 11 | 2020 | 5 | |
| 12 | 2021 | 5 | |
| 13 | 2020 | 5 | |
| 14 | 2021 | 5 | |
| 15 | 2018 | 4 | |
| 16 | 2023 | 3 | |
| 17 | Forest soil characteristic in Latvia according results of the demonstration project BioSoil. | 2009 | 3 |
| 18 | 2017 | 3 | |
| 19 | 2021 | 3 | |
| 20 | 2022 | 2 |
About Endijs Bāders
Endijs Bāders is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Global and Planetary Change, Insect Science, Ecology and Mechanical Engineering, having authored 28 papers that have together received 245 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Forest ecology and management (17 papers), Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (13 papers), Forest Management and Policy (8 papers), Tree Root and Stability Studies (6 papers), Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology (5 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (4 papers), Tree-ring climate responses (3 papers) and Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (135 citations), Insect Science (100 citations), Global and Planetary Change (134 citations), Ecology (55 citations) and Atmospheric Science (30 citations). Endijs Bāders has collaborated with scholars based in Latvia, Estonia and Finland. Frequent co-authors include Āris Jansons, Didzis Elferts, Jānis Donis, Kalev Jõgiste, Floortje Vodde, Tiit Maaten, Henn Korjus, Vitas Marozas, Kajar Köster and Lee E. Frelich. Their work appears in journals such as Forests, Sustainability, European Journal of Forest Research, Ecosphere and Remote Sensing.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.