Emmanuel Grenier

64 papers receiving 1.9k citations

Peers

Emmanuel Grenier
Comparison fields: 5 of 133
  • Applied Mathematics 1.0k
  • Mathematical Physics 550
  • Modeling and Simulation 245
  • Computational Mechanics 679
  • Numerical Analysis 71
Replace M. Sammartino with:
M. Sammartino Italy
Roberto Natalini Italy
Reinhard Illner Canada
Dejan Slepčev United States
Alexander Kiselev United States
René L. Schilling Germany
Kun Zhao United States
István Gyöngy United Kingdom
Aslak Tveito Norway
Jonathan C. Mattingly United States
Emmanuel Grenier relative to M. Sammartino Italy M. Sammartino's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
M. Sammartino · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Emmanuel Grenier

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emmanuel Grenier's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emmanuel Grenier with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emmanuel Grenier more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emmanuel Grenier

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emmanuel Grenier. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emmanuel Grenier. The network helps show where Emmanuel Grenier may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Emmanuel Grenier, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Emmanuel Grenier Line = papers co-authored together Emmanuel Grenier links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 71 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1998251
2 2000164
3 2000139
4 2000113
5 2006105
6 201299
7 199885
8 200966
9 200164
10 201059
11 199651
12 200850
13 201646
14 199945
15 202145
16 201044
17 200538
18 200137
19 200037
20 200927

About Emmanuel Grenier

Emmanuel Grenier is a scholar working on Applied Mathematics, Molecular Biology, Computational Mechanics, Mathematical Physics and Computational Theory and Mathematics, having authored 71 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Navier-Stokes equation solutions (19 papers), Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows (15 papers), Advanced Mathematical Physics Problems (10 papers), Mathematical Biology Tumor Growth (10 papers), Advanced Mathematical Modeling in Engineering (8 papers), Stability and Controllability of Differential Equations (6 papers), Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms (5 papers) and Plant tissue culture and regeneration (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Mathematics (1.0k citations), Mathematical Physics (550 citations), Modeling and Simulation (245 citations), Computational Mechanics (679 citations) and Numerical Analysis (71 citations). Emmanuel Grenier has collaborated with scholars based in France, United States and Morocco. Frequent co-authors include Yann Brenier, Stéphane Cordier, Benoı̂t Desjardins, Jean-Yves Chemin, Isabelle Gallagher, Olivier Guès, Jean‐Pierre Boissel, Benjamin Ribba, Toan T. Nguyen and Frédéric Rousset. Their work appears in journals such as Physiologia Plantarum, Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics, Communications in Partial Differential Equations, Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis and Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact