Emma Williams

2.1k citations
114 papers · 1.5k · h-index 22

Impact in

Papers in

Emma Williams

110 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Emma Williams
Comparison fields: 5 of 135
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 141
  • Aquatic Science 101
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 335
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 71
  • Ecology 199
Replace Rudy M. Ortiz with:
Rudy M. Ortiz United States
Cathy Debier Belgium
H. V. Murdaugh United States
Scott G. Wilson Australia
M. W. Smith Slovakia
A. St. G. Huggett United Kingdom
Riana Bornman South Africa
Cynthia R. Smith United States
Kebreab Ghebremeskel United Kingdom
Bernard G. Steinetz United States
Emma Williams relative to Rudy M. Ortiz United States Rudy M. Ortiz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.4×
Rudy M. Ortiz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Emma Williams

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emma Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emma Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emma Williams more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emma Williams

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emma Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emma Williams. The network helps show where Emma Williams may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Emma Williams, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Emma Williams Line = papers co-authored together Emma Williams links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 114 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017100
2 199669
3 196863
4 201560
5 196457
6 199147
7 199841
8 201338
9 197136
10 199236
11 201933
12 196432
13 202028
14 199826
15 199426
16 202024
17 202024
18 196924
19 202024
20 202023

About Emma Williams

Emma Williams is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Surgery, Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, Ecology and Physiology, having authored 114 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neonatal Respiratory Health Research (46 papers), Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (19 papers), Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Studies (17 papers), Neuroscience of respiration and sleep (13 papers), Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology (8 papers), Aquaculture Nutrition and Growth (7 papers), Physiological and biochemical adaptations (7 papers) and Lipid Membrane Structure and Behavior (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Agronomy and Crop Science (141 citations), Aquatic Science (101 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (335 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (71 citations) and Ecology (199 citations). Emma Williams has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Anne Greenough, Theodore Dassios, R. R. Oltjen, George N. Somero, L. L. Slyter, J. R. Hazel, Jeffrey R. Hazel, Charlotte Tye, Jonna Kuntsi and Seth Seegobin. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Animal Science, Journal of Perinatal Medicine, Pediatric Research, Acta Paediatrica and Early Human Development.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact