Emma Visman

420 citations
14 papers · 228 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Emma Visman

14 papers receiving 223 citations

Peers

Emma Visman
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • Global and Planetary Change 118
  • General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 48
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 15
  • Business and International Management 4
Replace Guillaume Simonet with:
Guillaume Simonet France
Sumetee Pahwa Gajjar United States
Francis Obeng Ghana
Tracy Cull South Africa
Ana Maria Bedran-Martins Brazil
Sonja Deppisch Germany
Rike Stotten Austria
Peter Moug United Kingdom
A K M Kanak Pervez Bangladesh
Gérard Hutter Germany
Emma Visman relative to Guillaume Simonet France Guillaume Simonet's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Guillaume Simonet · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Emma Visman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emma Visman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emma Visman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emma Visman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emma Visman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emma Visman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emma Visman. The network helps show where Emma Visman may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Emma Visman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Emma Visman Line = papers co-authored together Emma Visman links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 202061
2 201450
3 201823
4 202221
5 202114
6 202313
7 202113
8 20209
9 20229
10 20226
11 20144
12 20212
13 20212
14
Building Blocks for Co-producing Climate Services
20201

About Emma Visman

Emma Visman is a scholar working on Global and Planetary Change, Sociology and Political Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Finance and Information Systems, having authored 14 papers that have together received 228 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Flood Risk Assessment and Management (4 papers), Climate change impacts on agriculture (4 papers), Sustainability and Climate Change Governance (4 papers), Disaster Management and Resilience (3 papers), Hydrology and Drought Analysis (3 papers), Climate variability and models (2 papers), Community Development and Social Impact (2 papers) and Agricultural risk and resilience (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Global and Planetary Change (118 citations), General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (22 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (48 citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (15 citations) and Business and International Management (4 citations). Emma Visman has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, South Africa and Zambia. Frequent co-authors include Katharine Vincent, Anna Steynor, Dominic Kniveton, Lucy Pearson, Arame Tall, Emmah Mwangi, Mark Pelling, Rebecca Murphy, Helen Adams and Martin C. Todd. Their work appears in journals such as Climate Services, Malaria Journal, Weather and Climate Extremes, Disasters and Nature Climate Change.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact