Emma Slaymaker

49 papers receiving 1.8k citations

Emma Slaymaker's Hit Papers

Sexual behaviour in context: a global perspective 2006 · 695 citations
6950+6+13Years since publication200400600

Peers

Emma Slaymaker
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
  • General Health Professions 793
  • Infectious Diseases 569
  • Gender Studies 129
  • Safety Research 94
  • Epidemiology 291
Replace Jane Chege with:
Jane Chege France
James D Shelton United States
Miriam Hartmann United States
Zachary Kwena Kenya
Angela Obasi United Kingdom
Stella Neema Uganda
Theresa M. Exner United States
Naomi Rutenberg United States
David A. Ross United Kingdom
Rebecca French United Kingdom
Emma Slaymaker relative to Jane Chege France Jane Chege's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.5×
Jane Chege · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Emma Slaymaker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emma Slaymaker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emma Slaymaker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emma Slaymaker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emma Slaymaker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emma Slaymaker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emma Slaymaker. The network helps show where Emma Slaymaker may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Emma Slaymaker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Emma Slaymaker Line = papers co-authored together Emma Slaymaker links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 55 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Sexual behaviour in context: a global perspective
Hit paper breakdown →
2006695
2 2019123
3 201488
4 200477
5 201570
6 200962
7 201459
8 200753
9 200849
10 202045
11 201645
12 200545
13 201942
14 201435
15 201330
16 200928
17 201528
18 201025
19 200924
20
Condom use in Uganda and Zimbabwe: exploring the influence of gendered access to resources and couple-level dynamics.
200523

About Emma Slaymaker

Emma Slaymaker is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Infectious Diseases, Economics and Econometrics, Sociology and Political Science and Epidemiology, having authored 55 papers that have together received 1.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions (14 papers), Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health (14 papers), HIV/AIDS Impact and Responses (7 papers), HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk (4 papers), Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare (3 papers), Sex work and related issues (2 papers), Global Maternal and Child Health (2 papers) and Legionella and Acanthamoeba research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Health Professions (793 citations), Infectious Diseases (569 citations), Gender Studies (129 citations), Safety Research (94 citations) and Epidemiology (291 citations). Emma Slaymaker has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Tanzania and South Africa. Frequent co-authors include Kaye Wellings, Nathalie Bajos, Susheela Singh, Martine Collumbien, Dhaval Patel, Basia Żaba, Milly Marston, Mark Urassa, Ivan Kasamba and Frank Tanser. Their work appears in journals such as Sexually Transmitted Infections, AIDS, The Lancet Global Health, Global Health Action and Bulletin of the World Health Organization.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact