Emma Roberts

1.6k citations
45 papers · 1.2k · h-index 20

Impact in

Papers in

Emma Roberts

41 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Emma Roberts
Comparison fields: 5 of 101
  • Pharmacology 304
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 270
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 176
  • Gastroenterology 69
  • Small Animals 82
Replace Michael D. Cain with:
Michael D. Cain Australia
Peter Robinson Australia
Barbara Kamińska Poland
D. van der Heide Netherlands
Niklas Andersson Sweden
Masahiro Nagano Japan
W. Kaufmann Germany
Nobuo Kitamura Japan
J. M. Bassett United Kingdom
J.P. Barlet France
Emma Roberts relative to Michael D. Cain Australia Michael D. Cain's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10.3×
Michael D. Cain · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Emma Roberts

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emma Roberts's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emma Roberts with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emma Roberts more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emma Roberts

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emma Roberts. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emma Roberts. The network helps show where Emma Roberts may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Emma Roberts, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Emma Roberts Line = papers co-authored together Emma Roberts links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 45 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2008110
2 2013105
3 2011105
4 201093
5 201186
6 200980
7 197661
8 200958
9 201251
10 200848
11 199147
12 200641
13 200532
14 197829
15 201026
16 200824
17 197824
18 201521
19 199120
20 198819

About Emma Roberts

Emma Roberts is a scholar working on Agronomy and Crop Science, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Genetics, Small Animals and Surgery, having authored 45 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reproductive Physiology in Livestock (12 papers), Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (9 papers), Thyroid Disorders and Treatments (5 papers), Reproductive Biology and Fertility (5 papers), Apelin-related biomedical research (5 papers), Cardiovascular, Neuropeptides, and Oxidative Stress Research (4 papers), Hormonal Regulation and Hypertension (4 papers) and Veterinary Equine Medical Research (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacology (304 citations), Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (270 citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (176 citations), Gastroenterology (69 citations) and Small Animals (82 citations). Emma Roberts has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Stephen J. Lolait, George R. Pope, Anne‐Marie O’Carroll, M. G. Lambert, J Eppleston, Y. Fukui, Jane Sanders, Jadwiga Furmaniak, Michele K. Evans and Bernard Rees Smith. Their work appears in journals such as Reproduction, Journal of Endocrinology, Theriogenology, Veterinary Record and Journal of Neuroendocrinology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact