Emma Ray

732 citations
12 papers · 164 · h-index 4

Impact in

Papers in

Emma Ray

12 papers receiving 158 citations

Peers

Emma Ray
Comparison fields: 5 of 49
  • Clinical Psychology 124
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 5
  • General Health Professions 76
  • Emergency Medical Services 19
  • Applied Psychology 12
Replace Osama Hashim Mohammad with:
Osama Hashim Mohammad Qatar
Navin Devkota Nepal
Melanie Tan Singapore
Malaika Fuchs Netherlands
Nikhil Pattani United Kingdom
Ana Llorente Spain
Montserrat Venturas Nieto Spain
Hiroki Asaoka Japan
Rupa Bhundia United Kingdom
Shuai Fu United States
Emma Ray relative to Osama Hashim Mohammad Qatar Osama Hashim Mohammad's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Osama Hashim Mohammad · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Emma Ray

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emma Ray's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emma Ray with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emma Ray more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emma Ray

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emma Ray. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emma Ray. The network helps show where Emma Ray may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Emma Ray, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Emma Ray Line = papers co-authored together Emma Ray links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
#Work
1 2020113
2 202122
3 202110
4 20227
5 20213
6 20142
7
Mental health of respiratory nurses working during the Covid-19 crisis
20212
8 20211
9 20231
10 20191
11 20211
12 20171

About Emma Ray

Emma Ray is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Clinical Psychology, Physiology, General Health Professions and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 12 papers that have together received 164 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research (5 papers), COVID-19 and Mental Health (5 papers), Asthma and respiratory diseases (3 papers), Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (2 papers), Emergency and Acute Care Studies (2 papers), COVID-19 and healthcare impacts (2 papers), Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation (2 papers) and Infection Control and Ventilation (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (124 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (5 citations), General Health Professions (76 citations), Emergency Medical Services (19 citations) and Applied Psychology (12 citations). Emma Ray has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and Singapore. Frequent co-authors include Carol Kelly, Kate Lippiett, Nicola Roberts, Lindsay Welch, Kareena McAloney‐Kocaman, Alexander Hicks, Sharon Lin, Mike Thomas, David Culliford and Matthew Johnson. Their work appears in journals such as npj Primary Care Respiratory Medicine, BMJ Open Respiratory Research, Respiratory Medicine, European Respiratory Journal and Journal of Clinical Nursing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact