Emma Proïcs

1.3k citations
7 papers · 716 · h-index 6

Impact in

  • Epidemiology top 10%
    • Autophagy in Disease and Therapy
    • Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Cell Biology top 10%
    • Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress and Disease

Papers in

    • Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways 2
    • Mitochondrial Function and Pathology 1
    • Intraperitoneal and Appendiceal Malignancies 1

Emma Proïcs

6 papers receiving 710 citations

Peers

Emma Proïcs
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
  • Epidemiology 312
  • Cell Biology 147
  • Molecular Biology 346
  • Immunology 100
  • Biological Psychiatry 11
Replace Guang‐Nian Zhao with:
Guang‐Nian Zhao China
Weihua Gong China
Su Myung Jung South Korea
Yifei Lv China
Elisabetta Mormone Italy
Xiaoyan Xu China
Juli Bai United States
Manuela D’Eletto Italy
Lingdi Wang China
Jason Fan United States
Emma Proïcs relative to Guang‐Nian Zhao China Guang‐Nian Zhao's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Guang‐Nian Zhao · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Emma Proïcs

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emma Proïcs's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emma Proïcs with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emma Proïcs more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emma Proïcs

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emma Proïcs. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emma Proïcs. The network helps show where Emma Proïcs may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Emma Proïcs, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Emma Proïcs Line = papers co-authored together Emma Proïcs links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

7 of 7 papers shown
#Work
1 2015344
2 2017242
3 201557
4 202242
5 202425
6 20186
7 20160

About Emma Proïcs

Emma Proïcs is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Surgery, Oncology, Epidemiology and Cell Biology, having authored 7 papers that have together received 716 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways (2 papers), CAR-T cell therapy research (2 papers), Intraperitoneal and Appendiceal Malignancies (1 paper), Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (1 paper), Amoebic Infections and Treatments (1 paper), Diet and metabolism studies (1 paper), Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress and Disease (1 paper) and Mitochondrial Function and Pathology (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Epidemiology (312 citations), Cell Biology (147 citations), Molecular Biology (346 citations), Immunology (100 citations) and Biological Psychiatry (11 citations). Emma Proïcs has collaborated with scholars based in France, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Jean‐Ehrland Ricci, Johanna Chiche, Camila Rubio‐Patiño, Elodie Villa, Laura Mondragón, Barbara Zunino, Albert Tran, Stéphanie Patouraux, Carole Rovère and Cynthia Lebeaupin. Their work appears in journals such as Oncogene, Oncotarget, Journal of Neuroinflammation, Cell Death and Disease and Cell Reports.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact