Emma Murphy

49 papers receiving 527 citations

Peers

Emma Murphy
Comparison fields: 5 of 101
  • Human Factors and Ergonomics 92
  • Human-Computer Interaction 100
  • Occupational Therapy 34
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 134
  • General Decision Sciences 13
Replace Tom Tullis with:
Tom Tullis United States
Davide Bolchini United States
Karen Clarke United Kingdom
Joyce Karreman Netherlands
Karen Stendal Norway
José Fernández Cerero Spain
Sergio Sayago Spain
Sherry E. Mead United States
Fiachra Ó’Brolcháin Ireland
Oliver Burmeister Australia
Emma Murphy relative to Tom Tullis United States Tom Tullis's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.2×
Tom Tullis · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Emma Murphy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emma Murphy's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emma Murphy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emma Murphy more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emma Murphy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emma Murphy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emma Murphy. The network helps show where Emma Murphy may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Emma Murphy, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Emma Murphy Line = papers co-authored together Emma Murphy links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 53 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200767
2 202155
3 201439
4 200536
5 202029
6 201929
7 201325
8
NON-SPEECH SOUNDS AS ELEMENTS OF A USE SCENARIO: A SEMIOTIC PERSPECTIVE
200625
9 202118
10
The new Arab media : technology, image and perception
201114
11 201514
12 201014
13 201114
14 202113
15 201713
16 201712
17
Developing Sounds for a Multimodal Interface: Conveying Spatial Information to Visually Impaired Web Users
200711
18 201711
19 201111
20 201410

About Emma Murphy

Emma Murphy is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Human-Computer Interaction, Epidemiology, Human Factors and Ergonomics and Demography, having authored 53 papers that have together received 571 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Tactile and Sensory Interactions (10 papers), Chronic Disease Management Strategies (10 papers), Digital Accessibility for Disabilities (7 papers), Technology Use by Older Adults (6 papers), Usability and User Interface Design (5 papers), Interactive and Immersive Displays (4 papers), Multisensory perception and integration (3 papers) and Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human Factors and Ergonomics (92 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (100 citations), Occupational Therapy (34 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (134 citations) and General Decision Sciences (13 citations). Emma Murphy has collaborated with scholars based in Ireland, United Kingdom and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Wai Yu, Ravi Kuber, Graham McAllister, Julie Doyle, John Dinsmore, Catherine Comiskey, Caoimhe Hannigan, Suzanne Smith, An Jacobs and Gerd Gigerenzer. Their work appears in journals such as Age and Ageing, Journal of Medical Internet Research, Visual Communication, International Journal of Integrated Care and Interacting with Computers.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact