Emma Hooper
Impact in
- Speech and Hearing top 10%
- Noise Effects and Management
-
- Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
Papers in
-
- Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation 4
-
- Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research 5
- Co-authors
- Piers Dawes (6 shared papers)Tracy Collins (1 shared paper)Iracema Leroi (8 shared papers)Chryssoula Thodi (2 shared papers)Laura Brown (3 shared papers)Christopher J. Armitage (5 shared papers)Fofi Constantinidou (1 shared paper)Patricia Heyn (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of the American Medical Directors Association (2 papers)Trials (2 papers)Gerontology (1 paper)Dementia (1 paper)Journal of Applied Gerontology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomIrelandAustralia
In The Last Decade
Emma Hooper
9 papers receiving 73 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 32
- Speech and Hearing 38
- Sensory Systems 15
- Cognitive Neuroscience 42
- Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 2
- Psychiatry and Mental health 18
Countries citing papers authored by Emma Hooper
This map shows the geographic impact of Emma Hooper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emma Hooper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emma Hooper more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Emma Hooper
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emma Hooper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emma Hooper. The network helps show where Emma Hooper may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Emma Hooper, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2021 | 24 | |
| 2 | 2019 | 15 | |
| 3 | 2022 | 13 | |
| 4 | 2016 | 11 | |
| 5 | 2024 | 3 | |
| 6 | 2020 | 3 | |
| 7 | 2021 | 3 | |
| 8 | 2020 | 2 | |
| 9 | 2021 | 2 | |
| 10 | 2024 | 0 |
About Emma Hooper
Emma Hooper is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Psychiatry and Mental health, General Health Professions, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis and Speech and Hearing, having authored 10 papers that have together received 76 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (5 papers), Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (4 papers), Urban Green Space and Health (3 papers), Noise Effects and Management (3 papers), Delphi Technique in Research (2 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (2 papers), Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (1 paper) and Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Speech and Hearing (38 citations), Sensory Systems (15 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (42 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (2 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (18 citations). Emma Hooper has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Ireland and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Piers Dawes, Tracy Collins, Iracema Leroi, Chryssoula Thodi, Laura Brown, Christopher J. Armitage, Fofi Constantinidou, Patricia Heyn, Donna M. Langenbahn and Carrie L. Nieman. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, Trials, Gerontology, Dementia and Journal of Applied Gerontology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.