Emma Grace

19 papers receiving 484 citations

Peers

Emma Grace
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
  • Occupational Therapy 90
  • Human Factors and Ergonomics 45
  • Reproductive Medicine 56
  • Communication 34
  • Safety Research 34
Replace Nete Schwennesen with:
Nete Schwennesen Denmark
Ingeborg Nilsson Sweden
Beth Ashby Jones United States
Ronna C. Turner United States
Ericka Johnson Sweden
Per Måseide Norway
Karen McCarthy United States
Lex Frieden United States
João Amado Portugal
Gillian Robinson United Kingdom
Emma Grace relative to Nete Schwennesen Denmark Nete Schwennesen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×15×18×
Nete Schwennesen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Emma Grace

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emma Grace's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emma Grace with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emma Grace more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emma Grace

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emma Grace. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emma Grace. The network helps show where Emma Grace may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Emma Grace, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Emma Grace Line = papers co-authored together Emma Grace links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201682
2 199171
3 201364
4 198246
5 201445
6 201842
7 201541
8 198330
9 198026
10 201321
11 201912
12 202411
13
Endocrinologic and psychological effects of short-term dexamethasone in anorexia nervosa.
20009
14 19946
15 20234
16 20184
17 20252
18 20222
19 19871
20 19921

About Emma Grace

Emma Grace is a scholar working on Occupational Therapy, Clinical Psychology, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Neurology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 22 papers that have together received 520 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility (5 papers), Family and Disability Support Research (4 papers), Reproductive Health and Contraception (3 papers), Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum (3 papers), Intracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Research (2 papers), Child Development and Digital Technology (2 papers), Ultrasound in Clinical Applications (2 papers) and Sexual Differentiation and Disorders (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Occupational Therapy (90 citations), Human Factors and Ergonomics (45 citations), Reproductive Medicine (56 citations), Communication (34 citations) and Safety Research (34 citations). Emma Grace has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Parimala Raghavendra, Lareen Newman, Denise Wood, S. Jean Emans, Kathryn Browne‐Yung, Veronica A. Ravnikar, DONALD PETER GOLDSTEIN, Claire Louise Hutchinson, Ellen Fleischnick and John F. Crigler. Their work appears in journals such as Intensive Care Medicine, International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, BMJ Open, Communication Disorders Quarterly and PEDIATRICS.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact