Emma E. Williams

807 citations
65 papers · 560 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Emma E. Williams

59 papers receiving 543 citations

Peers

Emma E. Williams
Comparison fields: 5 of 50
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 339
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 75
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 12
  • Surgery 66
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 7
Replace Roy Maynard with:
Roy Maynard United States
Henriëtte Anje van Zanten Netherlands
Ryan E. Lucash United States
Judith Leigh Hough Australia
Clémentine Combes France
Ronald A. Stoddard United States
Hirokazu Sakai Japan
Teresa L. Gratton United States
Manndi C. Loertscher United States
Michelle Poe United States
Emma E. Williams relative to Roy Maynard United States Roy Maynard's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8×9×
Roy Maynard · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Emma E. Williams

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emma E. Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emma E. Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emma E. Williams more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emma E. Williams

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emma E. Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emma E. Williams. The network helps show where Emma E. Williams may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Emma E. Williams, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Emma E. Williams Line = papers co-authored together Emma E. Williams links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 65 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201936
2 202029
3 202025
4 202025
5 202125
6 202024
7 201922
8 202121
9 201619
10 202019
11 201916
12 202116
13 201915
14 201913
15 201913
16 202113
17 202112
18 202112
19 202111
20 202211

About Emma E. Williams

Emma E. Williams is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Physiology, Surgery and Clinical Psychology, having authored 65 papers that have together received 560 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neonatal Respiratory Health Research (42 papers), Infant Development and Preterm Care (7 papers), Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Studies (6 papers), Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (6 papers), Asthma and respiratory diseases (4 papers), Smoking Behavior and Cessation (2 papers), Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare (2 papers) and Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (339 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (75 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (12 citations), Surgery (66 citations) and Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (7 citations). Emma E. Williams has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Germany and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Anne Greenough, Theodore G. Dassios, Ann Hickey, Katie A. Hunt, Ravindra Bhat, Kamal Ali, Catey Bunce, Christopher Harris, Mark Davenport and Vadivelam Murthy. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Perinatal Medicine, Acta Paediatrica, Early Human Development, Pediatric Research and Frontiers in Pediatrics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact