Emma E. Hellawell

23 papers receiving 365 citations

Peers

Emma E. Hellawell
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering 172
  • Strategy and Management 159
  • Environmental Chemistry 65
  • Transportation 44
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 41
Replace Tohru Morioka with:
Tohru Morioka Japan
Haitao Chen China
Zuoxi Liu China
Yan Ping China
Christopher F. Wooldridge United Kingdom
Xinbei Wang China
Juanjuan Wu China
Leslie W. Ayres France
Chanjief Chandrakumar New Zealand
Emma E. Hellawell relative to Tohru Morioka Japan Tohru Morioka's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×4.9×
Tohru Morioka · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Emma E. Hellawell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emma E. Hellawell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emma E. Hellawell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emma E. Hellawell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emma E. Hellawell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emma E. Hellawell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emma E. Hellawell. The network helps show where Emma E. Hellawell may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 18 scholars most cited alongside Emma E. Hellawell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Emma E. Hellawell Line = papers co-authored together Emma E. Hellawell links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011170
2 200449
3 201232
4 200427
5 201026
6
GROUTING FOR GROUND ENGINEERING
200014
7 202014
8 200113
9 200612
10 200112
11
Centrifuge modelling of the removal of heavy metal pollutants using electrokinetics.
19966
12 20106
13 20016
14 20013
15 20223
16 20072
17 20002
18 20202
19 20101
20 20221

About Emma E. Hellawell

Emma E. Hellawell is a scholar working on Transportation, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Automotive Engineering, Pollution and Environmental Engineering, having authored 25 papers that have together received 405 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Environmental Justice and Health Disparities (5 papers), Air Quality and Health Impacts (5 papers), Transportation Planning and Optimization (5 papers), Vehicle emissions and performance (5 papers), Groundwater flow and contamination studies (2 papers), Chemistry and Chemical Engineering (2 papers), Landfill Environmental Impact Studies (2 papers) and 3D Modeling in Geospatial Applications (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (172 citations), Strategy and Management (159 citations), Environmental Chemistry (65 citations), Transportation (44 citations) and Management of Technology and Innovation (41 citations). Emma E. Hellawell has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include Susan Hughes, Paul D. Jensen, Lauren L. Basson, Matthew A. Leach, Ling L. Lim, Maria Mavroulidou, Andrew C. Kemp, Birgitta Gatersleben, Paul E. Canning and John Lamont-Black. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Geotechnical Engineering, Journal of Environmental Management, Environmental Research, Environmental Modelling & Software and SOILS AND FOUNDATIONS.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact