Emma E. Condy

559 citations
23 papers · 369 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Emma E. Condy

23 papers receiving 362 citations

Peers

Emma E. Condy
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 238
  • Clinical Psychology 90
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 60
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 43
  • Social Psychology 47
Replace Morimitsu Sakihama with:
Morimitsu Sakihama Japan
Wan-Chun Su United States
Rianne Haartsen United Kingdom
Yuebo Fan China
Helga O. Miguel United States
Laura Pirazzoli United Kingdom
Kotoe Sakihara Japan
Tyler C. Duffield United States
Daniel B. Cassel Canada
Kathryn E. Unruh United States
Emma E. Condy relative to Morimitsu Sakihama Japan Morimitsu Sakihama's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.4×
Morimitsu Sakihama · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Emma E. Condy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emma E. Condy's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emma E. Condy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emma E. Condy more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emma E. Condy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emma E. Condy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emma E. Condy. The network helps show where Emma E. Condy may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Emma E. Condy, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Emma E. Condy Line = papers co-authored together Emma E. Condy links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201880
2 201653
3 202333
4 201728
5 202127
6 201919
7 201916
8 201713
9 202012
10 202011
11 202211
12 20218
13 20228
14 20218
15 20217
16 20217
17 20216
18 20195
19 20245
20 20195

About Emma E. Condy

Emma E. Condy is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Psychiatry and Mental health, Social Psychology and Clinical Psychology, having authored 23 papers that have together received 369 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (6 papers), Optical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques (6 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (5 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (5 papers), Action Observation and Synchronization (4 papers), Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control (4 papers), Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders (3 papers) and Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (238 citations), Clinical Psychology (90 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (60 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (43 citations) and Social Psychology (47 citations). Emma E. Condy has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Czechia and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Angela Scarpa, Reina S. Factor, Amir Gandjbakhche, Bruce H. Friedman, Marlene V. Strege, Julee P. Farley, John A. Richey, Ligia Antezana, Helga O. Miguel and Nathan A. Fox. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, Scientific Reports, Frontiers in Neuroscience, Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders and Photonics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact