Emma E. Buchtel

2.3k citations
28 papers · 1.4k · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

Emma E. Buchtel

28 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Emma E. Buchtel
Comparison fields: 5 of 102
  • Social Psychology 755
  • Applied Psychology 131
  • Health 140
  • Clinical Psychology 341
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 211
Replace Michael A. Zárate with:
Michael A. Zárate United States
Janetta Lun United States
Zachary K. Rothschild United States
Mauricio Carvallo United States
Kathryn C. Oleson United States
Kristin L. Sommer United States
Julie Spencer‐Rodgers United States
J. P. Gerber United States
Catherine A. Cottrell United States
Yubo Hou China
Emma E. Buchtel relative to Michael A. Zárate United States Michael A. Zárate's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Michael A. Zárate · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Emma E. Buchtel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emma E. Buchtel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emma E. Buchtel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emma E. Buchtel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emma E. Buchtel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emma E. Buchtel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emma E. Buchtel. The network helps show where Emma E. Buchtel may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Emma E. Buchtel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Emma E. Buchtel Line = papers co-authored together Emma E. Buchtel links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2008294
2 2008154
3 2017130
4 201589
5 201576
6 201575
7 200972
8 201862
9 200862
10 200957
11 201949
12 201848
13 200947
14 201344
15 201736
16 201924
17 201620
18 201319
19 201714
20 20218

About Emma E. Buchtel

Emma E. Buchtel is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Cognitive Neuroscience, Clinical Psychology and Communication, having authored 28 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cultural Differences and Values (21 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (16 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (9 papers), Emotions and Moral Behavior (5 papers), Personality Traits and Psychology (5 papers), Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (3 papers), International Student and Expatriate Challenges (3 papers) and Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Social Psychology (755 citations), Applied Psychology (131 citations), Health (140 citations), Clinical Psychology (341 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (211 citations). Emma E. Buchtel has collaborated with scholars based in Hong Kong, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Steven J. Heine, Ara Norenzayan, Sylvia Xiaohua Chen, Yanjun Guan, Michael Harris Bond, Ben C. P. Lam, Jacky C. K. Ng, Joseph Bulbulia, Annika M. Svedholm‐Häkkinen and Eva Kundtová Klocová. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Res Philosophica and Psychological Inquiry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact