Emma Blomkamp

1.3k citations
14 papers · 761 · 1 hit paper · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Emma Blomkamp

13 papers receiving 721 citations

Emma Blomkamp's Hit Papers

The rise of public sector innovation labs: experiments in design thinking for policy 2018 · 194 citations
1940+2+5Years since publication50100150

Peers

Emma Blomkamp
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 387
  • Public Administration 72
  • Media Technology 113
  • Human-Computer Interaction 55
  • Marketing 89
Replace June Lennie with:
June Lennie Australia
Liisa Horelli Finland
Eric Joseph van Holm United States
Elaine K. Yakura United States
Marianne de Laet United States
Hal Salzman United States
Brit Ross Winthereik Denmark
Maximilian Fochler Austria
Lucia Crevani Sweden
Lizzie Richardson United Kingdom
Emma Blomkamp relative to June Lennie Australia June Lennie's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×33×
June Lennie · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Emma Blomkamp

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emma Blomkamp's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emma Blomkamp with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emma Blomkamp more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emma Blomkamp

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emma Blomkamp. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emma Blomkamp. The network helps show where Emma Blomkamp may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 4 scholars most cited alongside Emma Blomkamp, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Emma Blomkamp Line = papers co-authored together Emma Blomkamp links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 2018257
2
The rise of public sector innovation labs: experiments in design thinking for policy
Hit paper breakdown →
2018194
3 2019121
4 201982
5 202134
6 202127
7 201812
8 201512
9 20149
10 20226
11 20123
12 20102
13 20211
14
Politics, Media and Entertainment
20131

About Emma Blomkamp

Emma Blomkamp is a scholar working on Management of Technology and Innovation, Sociology and Political Science, Urban Studies, Marketing and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 14 papers that have together received 761 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development (8 papers), Cultural Industries and Urban Development (4 papers), Service and Product Innovation (3 papers), Delphi Technique in Research (2 papers), Cinema and Media Studies (2 papers), Artistic and Creative Research (2 papers), Innovation, Technology, and Society (1 paper) and Diverse Music Education Insights (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Management of Technology and Innovation (387 citations), Public Administration (72 citations), Media Technology (113 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (55 citations) and Marketing (89 citations). Emma Blomkamp has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, New Zealand and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Michael McGann, Jenny M. Lewis, Kim Dunphy and Geoff Kemp. Their work appears in journals such as Policy Design and Practice, International Journal of Cultural Studies, Australian Journal of Public Administration, Evidence & Policy and International Journal of Cultural Policy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact