Emma Aneheim

1.2k citations
58 papers · 942 · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

Emma Aneheim

57 papers receiving 934 citations

Peers

Emma Aneheim
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering 348
  • Inorganic Chemistry 522
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 351
  • Materials Chemistry 323
  • Analytical Chemistry 54
Replace S. Basu with:
S. Basu India
Dahlia D. An United States
Cen Shi China
Tara Mastren United States
Madhava B. Mallia India
Eric T. Clarke United States
Manuel Sturzbecher‐Hoehne United States
Jennifer C. Carter United States
Thèodorine Bailly France
Dmitri Medvedev United States
Emma Aneheim relative to S. Basu India S. Basu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.9×
S. Basu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Emma Aneheim

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emma Aneheim's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emma Aneheim with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emma Aneheim more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emma Aneheim

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emma Aneheim. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emma Aneheim. The network helps show where Emma Aneheim may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Emma Aneheim, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Emma Aneheim Line = papers co-authored together Emma Aneheim links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 58 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010101
2 202069
3 201164
4 202349
5 201948
6 201538
7 201034
8 201233
9 201532
10 201130
11 201222
12 201622
13 201719
14 201419
15 201318
16 201818
17 201817
18 201417
19 202016
20 201916

About Emma Aneheim

Emma Aneheim is a scholar working on Inorganic Chemistry, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Materials Chemistry and Oncology, having authored 58 papers that have together received 942 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Radioactive element chemistry and processing (30 papers), Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications (26 papers), Chemical Synthesis and Characterization (21 papers), Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (12 papers), Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research (9 papers), Nuclear Materials and Properties (8 papers), Lanthanide and Transition Metal Complexes (8 papers) and Peptidase Inhibition and Analysis (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (348 citations), Inorganic Chemistry (522 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (351 citations), Materials Chemistry (323 citations) and Analytical Chemistry (54 citations). Emma Aneheim has collaborated with scholars based in Sweden, Denmark and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Christian Ekberg, M.R.St.J. Foreman, Sture Lindegren, Holger Jensen, Per Albertsson, Tom Bäck, Anna Fermvik, Stig Palm, Gunnar Skarnemark and Teodora Retegan. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry, Solvent Extraction and Ion Exchange, Scientific Reports, Separation Science and Technology and ChemPlusChem.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact