Emily Schmidt

994 citations
27 papers · 433 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Emily Schmidt

25 papers receiving 399 citations

Peers

Emily Schmidt
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
  • General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 126
  • Soil Science 138
  • Business and International Management 16
  • Safety Research 41
  • Economics and Econometrics 131
Replace Leonardo Corral with:
Leonardo Corral United States
Linden McBride United States
Diana Suhardiman Sri Lanka
Solomon Zena Walelign Denmark
Franz Heidhues Germany
Hiroki Uematsu United States
Pasquale De Muro Italy
Paul Corral United States
Rachel Godfrey‐Wood United Kingdom
Apurva Sanghi United States
Emily Schmidt relative to Leonardo Corral United States Leonardo Corral's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Leonardo Corral · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Emily Schmidt

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emily Schmidt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily Schmidt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily Schmidt more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emily Schmidt

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily Schmidt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily Schmidt. The network helps show where Emily Schmidt may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Emily Schmidt, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Emily Schmidt Line = papers co-authored together Emily Schmidt links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201175
2 201771
3 201041
4 201937
5 201534
6 202124
7 201722
8 202018
9 202017
10 202012
11 201312
12 20209
13 20188
14 20217
15 20207
16 20147
17 20136
18 20096
19 20125
20 20224

About Emily Schmidt

Emily Schmidt is a scholar working on Soil Science, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Economics and Econometrics, Sociology and Political Science and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, having authored 27 papers that have together received 433 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Land Rights and Reforms (7 papers), Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (4 papers), Agricultural Innovations and Practices (4 papers), Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development (4 papers), Migration and Labor Dynamics (4 papers), Agricultural risk and resilience (3 papers), Agriculture and Rural Development Research (3 papers) and Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (126 citations), Soil Science (138 citations), Business and International Management (16 citations), Safety Research (41 citations) and Economics and Econometrics (131 citations). Emily Schmidt has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Paul A. Dorosh, Fanaye Tadesse, Valerie Mueller, Hyoung Gun Wang, Katrina Kosec, Liangzhi You, Birhanu Zemadim, Hosaena Ghebru, Sherman Robinson and Paul Chinowsky. Their work appears in journals such as Agricultural Economics, International Regional Science Review, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Land Degradation and Development and Journal of Wildlife Management.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact