Emily Johnstone

7.6k citations
122 papers · 6.2k · h-index 41

Impact in

Papers in

Emily Johnstone

117 papers receiving 5.7k citations

Peers

Emily Johnstone
Comparison fields: 5 of 137
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 3.2k
  • Biological Psychiatry 295
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 1.7k
  • Philosophy 855
  • Clinical Psychology 1.1k
Replace Michael A. Flaum with:
Michael A. Flaum United States
S. Charles Schulz United States
R. Walter Heinrichs Canada
S.R. Hirsch United Kingdom
Tara Ann Niendam United States
Serge M. Sevy United States
Dwight Dickinson United States
David G. C. Owens United Kingdom
Graham K. Murray United Kingdom
George Foussias Canada
Emily Johnstone relative to Michael A. Flaum United States Michael A. Flaum's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Michael A. Flaum · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Emily Johnstone

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emily Johnstone's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily Johnstone with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily Johnstone more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emily Johnstone

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily Johnstone. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily Johnstone. The network helps show where Emily Johnstone may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Emily Johnstone, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Emily Johnstone Line = papers co-authored together Emily Johnstone links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 122 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1994410
2 2000400
3 1986305
4 2003296
5 1978237
6 1990236
7 2010212
8 1998212
9 1985201
10 1992186
11 2007185
12 2007159
13 2000153
14 1989140
15 2001126
16 1999120
17 2000120
18 1982108
19 200894
20 199993

About Emily Johnstone

Emily Johnstone is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Philosophy, Cognitive Neuroscience and Clinical Psychology, having authored 122 papers that have together received 6.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Schizophrenia research and treatment (49 papers), Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (16 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (13 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (11 papers), Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (7 papers), Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (6 papers), Tryptophan and brain disorders (5 papers) and Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (3.2k citations), Biological Psychiatry (295 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (1.7k citations), Philosophy (855 citations) and Clinical Psychology (1.1k citations). Emily Johnstone has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Timothy John Crow, Chris Frith, Stephen Lawrie, D. G. Cunningham Owens, J. Fiona Macmillan, Andrew Mark McIntosh, Jérémy Hall, D.J. Done, T.J. Crow and Amanda Sacker. Their work appears in journals such as Psychological Medicine, Schizophrenia Research, The British Journal of Psychiatry, The Lancet and Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact