Emily H. Stack
Impact in
- Aging top 10%
- Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms
-
- Hops Chemistry and Applications
Papers in
-
- Hops Chemistry and Applications 2
-
- Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms 1
- Co-authors
- Douglas Allen Hanes (3 shared papers)Ryan D. Bradley (3 shared papers)Romilly Hodges (1 shared paper)Kara N. Fitzgerald (1 shared paper)David Cheishvili (1 shared paper)Moshe Szyf (1 shared paper)Jan Frederik Stevens (2 shared papers)John C. Phipps (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Aging (1 paper)Molecular Nutrition & Food Research (1 paper)Trials (1 paper)Pathogens (1 paper)Alzheimer s & Dementia (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesIsraelCanada
In The Last Decade
Emily H. Stack
7 papers receiving 305 citations
Emily H. Stack's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
- Aging 25
- Pharmacology 41
- Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 5
- Geriatrics and Gerontology 9
- Physiology 58
Countries citing papers authored by Emily H. Stack
This map shows the geographic impact of Emily H. Stack's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily H. Stack with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily H. Stack more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Emily H. Stack
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily H. Stack. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily H. Stack. The network helps show where Emily H. Stack may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Emily H. Stack, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Potential reversal of epigenetic age using a diet and lifestyle intervention: a pilot randomized clinical trial Hit paper breakdown → | 2021 | 247 |
| 2 | 2021 | 29 | |
| 3 | 2020 | 22 | |
| 4 | 2023 | 9 | |
| 5 | 2023 | 3 | |
| 6 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 7 | 2006 | 1 | |
| 8 | 2025 | 0 |
About Emily H. Stack
Emily H. Stack is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Developmental Neuroscience, Immunology, Oncology and Aerospace Engineering, having authored 8 papers that have together received 312 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hops Chemistry and Applications (2 papers), T-cell and Retrovirus Studies (1 paper), Extracellular vesicles in disease (1 paper), Viral-associated cancers and disorders (1 paper), Icing and De-icing Technologies (1 paper), Horticultural and Viticultural Research (1 paper), Photoacoustic and Ultrasonic Imaging (1 paper) and Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Aging (25 citations), Pharmacology (41 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (5 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (9 citations) and Physiology (58 citations). Emily H. Stack has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Israel and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Douglas Allen Hanes, Ryan D. Bradley, Romilly Hodges, Kara N. Fitzgerald, David Cheishvili, Moshe Szyf, Jan Frederik Stevens, John C. Phipps, Jennifer Joan Ryan and Michelle L. Pleet. Their work appears in journals such as Aging, Molecular Nutrition & Food Research, Trials, Pathogens and Alzheimer s & Dementia.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.