Emily Gaarder
Impact in
- Health top 10%
- Intimate Partner and Family Violence
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Child Abuse and Trauma
- Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
Papers in
-
- Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis 8
- Crime Patterns and Interventions 3
-
- Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending 4
- Child Abuse and Trauma 3
- Co-authors
- Jennifer K. Wesely (1 shared paper)Marjorie S. Zatz (2 shared papers)Joanne Belknap (2 shared papers)Nancy Rodríguez (1 shared paper)Lois Presser (3 shared papers)Nancy Rodriguez (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Contemporary Justice Review (1 paper)Journal of Offender Rehabilitation (1 paper)Criminology (1 paper)Women & Criminal Justice (1 paper)Gender & Society (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Emily Gaarder
15 papers receiving 531 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
- Health 89
- Clinical Psychology 220
- Sociology and Political Science 414
- Gender Studies 80
- Geography, Planning and Development 40
Countries citing papers authored by Emily Gaarder
This map shows the geographic impact of Emily Gaarder's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily Gaarder with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily Gaarder more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Emily Gaarder
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily Gaarder. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily Gaarder. The network helps show where Emily Gaarder may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 6 scholars most cited alongside Emily Gaarder, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2004 | 140 | |
| 2 | 2004 | 127 | |
| 3 | 2002 | 95 | |
| 4 | Can Restorative Justice Reduce Battering? Some Preliminary Considerations | 2000 | 54 |
| 5 | 2017 | 37 | |
| 6 | 2011 | 31 | |
| 7 | 2019 | 20 | |
| 8 | 2008 | 19 | |
| 9 | 2007 | 17 | |
| 10 | 2004 | 17 | |
| 11 | 2015 | 12 | |
| 12 | 2013 | 5 | |
| 13 | 2000 | 5 | |
| 14 | 2012 | 4 | |
| 15 | 2015 | 1 | |
| 16 | 2007 | 0 |
About Emily Gaarder
Emily Gaarder is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Clinical Psychology, Geography, Planning and Development, Health and Nature and Landscape Conservation, having authored 16 papers that have together received 584 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (8 papers), Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (4 papers), Crime Patterns and Interventions (3 papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (3 papers), Wildlife Conservation and Criminology Analyses (2 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (2 papers), Intimate Partner and Family Violence (2 papers) and Geographies of human-animal interactions (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (89 citations), Clinical Psychology (220 citations), Sociology and Political Science (414 citations), Gender Studies (80 citations) and Geography, Planning and Development (40 citations). Emily Gaarder has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Jennifer K. Wesely, Marjorie S. Zatz, Joanne Belknap, Nancy Rodríguez, Lois Presser and Nancy Rodriguez. Their work appears in journals such as Contemporary Justice Review, Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, Criminology, Women & Criminal Justice and Gender & Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.