Emily E. Volk
Impact in
- Oral Surgery top 5%
- Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology
- Otorhinolaryngology top 10%
- Head and Neck Cancer Studies
Papers in
-
- Cervical Cancer and HPV Research 3
- Microscopic Colitis 2
- Surgery 5
- Colorectal and Anal Carcinomas 3
- Co-authors
- Jonathan H. Hughes (3 shared papers)David C. Wilbur (3 shared papers)Richard A. Prayson (1 shared paper)Robert E. Petras (2 shared papers)Claudio Fiocchi (1 shared paper)Gail West (1 shared paper)David G. Binion (1 shared paper)Judith Drazba (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine (4 papers)The Journal of Urology (1 paper)The Lancet (1 paper)Human Pathology (1 paper)Acta Cytologica (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Emily E. Volk
13 papers receiving 424 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
- Oral Surgery 89
- Otorhinolaryngology 44
- Oncology 142
- Obstetrics and Gynecology 39
- Surgery 210
Countries citing papers authored by Emily E. Volk
This map shows the geographic impact of Emily E. Volk's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily E. Volk with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily E. Volk more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Emily E. Volk
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily E. Volk. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily E. Volk. The network helps show where Emily E. Volk may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Emily E. Volk, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2005 | 150 | |
| 2 | 1998 | 83 | |
| 3 | 2004 | 43 | |
| 4 | 2004 | 37 | |
| 5 | 1997 | 28 | |
| 6 | 1999 | 22 | |
| 7 | The clinical significance of a biopsy-based diagnosis of focal active colitis: a clinicopathologic study of 31 cases. | 1998 | 21 |
| 8 | 2001 | 14 | |
| 9 | 2000 | 11 | |
| 10 | 2004 | 11 | |
| 11 | Cerebral malakoplakia associated with neonatal herpes virus infection. | 1992 | 9 |
| 12 | 2004 | 8 | |
| 13 | 1997 | 2 | |
| 14 | 1999 | 0 | |
| 15 | 2019 | 0 |
About Emily E. Volk
Emily E. Volk is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Surgery, Infectious Diseases, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Oncology, having authored 15 papers that have together received 439 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Colorectal and Anal Carcinomas (3 papers), Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (3 papers), Microscopic Colitis (2 papers), Pharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies (1 paper), Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies (1 paper), Genetic and Kidney Cyst Diseases (1 paper), Pleural and Pulmonary Diseases (1 paper) and Cell Adhesion Molecules Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Oral Surgery (89 citations), Otorhinolaryngology (44 citations), Oncology (142 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (39 citations) and Surgery (210 citations). Emily E. Volk has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Jonathan H. Hughes, David C. Wilbur, Richard A. Prayson, Robert E. Petras, Claudio Fiocchi, Gail West, David G. Binion, Judith Drazba, Nicholas P. Ziats and Dina R. Mody. Their work appears in journals such as Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, The Journal of Urology, The Lancet, Human Pathology and Acta Cytologica.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.