Emily E. Stackpole

450 citations
12 papers · 333 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

    • Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders 6
    • RNA modifications and cancer 8
    • RNA Research and Splicing 5
    • RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms 4
    • RNA regulation and disease 3
    • Congenital heart defects research 1

Emily E. Stackpole

12 papers receiving 328 citations

Peers

Emily E. Stackpole
Comparison fields: 5 of 48
  • Developmental Neuroscience 37
  • Genetics 141
  • Molecular Biology 247
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 54
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 13
Replace Rebecca S.F. Mok with:
Rebecca S.F. Mok Canada
Aline Dubos France
Martha E. Stone United States
Yating Liu United States
Roya Saffary United States
Yechiam Sapir Israel
Brian A. Rodriguez United States
Sonia Amabile Italy
Mara Cavallin France
Mattia Zaghi Italy
Emily E. Stackpole relative to Rebecca S.F. Mok Canada Rebecca S.F. Mok's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4.3×
Rebecca S.F. Mok · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Emily E. Stackpole

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emily E. Stackpole's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily E. Stackpole with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily E. Stackpole more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emily E. Stackpole

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily E. Stackpole. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily E. Stackpole. The network helps show where Emily E. Stackpole may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Emily E. Stackpole, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Emily E. Stackpole Line = papers co-authored together Emily E. Stackpole links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
#Work
1 201878
2 201267
3 201647
4 201627
5 201123
6 202121
7 201518
8 201418
9 201716
10 201813
11 20204
12 20191

About Emily E. Stackpole

Emily E. Stackpole is a scholar working on Genetics, Molecular Biology, Developmental Neuroscience, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine and Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, having authored 12 papers that have together received 333 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include RNA modifications and cancer (8 papers), Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders (6 papers), RNA Research and Splicing (5 papers), RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms (4 papers), RNA regulation and disease (3 papers), Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (1 paper), Congenital heart defects research (1 paper) and Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Neuroscience (37 citations), Genetics (141 citations), Molecular Biology (247 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (54 citations) and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (13 citations). Emily E. Stackpole has collaborated with scholars based in United States, France and China. Frequent co-authors include Justin R. Fallon, Michael R. Akins, Joel D. Richter, Botao Liu, Yue Li, Lucy Zhao, Xinyu Zhao, Yu Gao, Maria P. Ivshina and Katherine A. Shepard. Their work appears in journals such as Nucleic Acids Research, RNA, Chemical Senses, RNA Biology and The Journal of Comparative Neurology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact