Emily E. Moore

505 citations
38 papers · 390 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Emily E. Moore

35 papers receiving 389 citations

Peers

Emily E. Moore
Comparison fields: 5 of 21
  • Inorganic Chemistry 96
  • Materials Chemistry 203
  • General Materials Science 13
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 73
  • Aerospace Engineering 62
Replace Aleksandra Matraszek with:
Aleksandra Matraszek Poland
Ju.N. Grin Germany
E.A. Aitken United States
Heng-Fu Lin China
Fangui Meng China
Susumu Fujii Japan
Sergey V. Tomilin Russia
I. Ruiz‐Larrea Spain
Valentina S. Sudavtsova Ukraine
Saeed S. I. Almishal United States
Emily E. Moore relative to Aleksandra Matraszek Poland Aleksandra Matraszek's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8×9.5×
Aleksandra Matraszek · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Emily E. Moore

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emily E. Moore's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily E. Moore with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily E. Moore more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emily E. Moore

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily E. Moore. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily E. Moore. The network helps show where Emily E. Moore may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Emily E. Moore, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Emily E. Moore Line = papers co-authored together Emily E. Moore links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201332
2 201131
3 201830
4 201829
5 201825
6 201822
7 201820
8 202320
9 202019
10 201616
11 201915
12 202014
13 202211
14 201810
15 202010
16 20209
17 20188
18 20228
19 20248
20 20207

About Emily E. Moore

Emily E. Moore is a scholar working on Inorganic Chemistry, Materials Chemistry, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Aerospace Engineering and General Materials Science, having authored 38 papers that have together received 390 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nuclear Materials and Properties (17 papers), Radioactive element chemistry and processing (10 papers), Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties (5 papers), Thermodynamic and Structural Properties of Metals and Alloys (3 papers), Magnetic Properties of Alloys (3 papers), Nuclear materials and radiation effects (3 papers), Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes (2 papers) and Metallurgical and Alloy Processes (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Inorganic Chemistry (96 citations), Materials Chemistry (203 citations), General Materials Science (13 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (73 citations) and Aerospace Engineering (62 citations). Emily E. Moore has collaborated with scholars based in United States, France and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Theodore M. Besmann, Hans‐Conrad zur Loye, Aurélien P. Perron, Jean-Paul Crocombette, Christine Guéneau, Vancho Kocevski, Per Söderlind, Theodore M. Besmann, A. I. Landa and Hunter B. Henderson. Their work appears in journals such as Applied Sciences, Journal of Nuclear Materials, Inorganic Chemistry, Materials & Design and Metals.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact