Emily Browne

721 citations
19 papers · 502 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Emily Browne

19 papers receiving 482 citations

Peers

Emily Browne
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
  • Emergency Medical Services 223
  • Pharmacy 106
  • Family Practice 35
  • Research and Theory 12
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 65
Replace Fatma Cebeci with:
Fatma Cebeci Türkiye
Pauline Occelli France
Mary F. Terhaar United States
Francesca Rosa Italy
Kathryn Horner United States
David G. Metro United States
Maureen Gang United States
Robyn S. Shapiro United States
Robert Klaber United Kingdom
Nursen Nahcivan Türkiye
Emily Browne relative to Fatma Cebeci Türkiye Fatma Cebeci's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.9×
Fatma Cebeci · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Emily Browne

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emily Browne's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily Browne with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily Browne more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emily Browne

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily Browne. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily Browne. The network helps show where Emily Browne may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Emily Browne, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Emily Browne Line = papers co-authored together Emily Browne links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 2014187
2 2016126
3 201441
4 201837
5 201728
6 201419
7 201714
8 201714
9 20227
10 20216
11 19876
12 20225
13 20155
14 20202
15 20231
16 20241
17 20211
18
Safe spaces for girls: Six-country mapping (GSDRC Helpdesk Research Report 937)
20131
19
Child-friendly spaces for adolescent girls in emergency settings (GSDRC Helpdesk Research Report 932)
20131

About Emily Browne

Emily Browne is a scholar working on Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Oncology, Sociology and Political Science and Physiology, having authored 19 papers that have together received 502 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (9 papers), Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia research (6 papers), Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (2 papers), Patient Safety and Medication Errors (2 papers), Cancer Risks and Factors (2 papers), Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues (2 papers), Pharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies (1 paper) and Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Emergency Medical Services (223 citations), Pharmacy (106 citations), Family Practice (35 citations), Research and Theory (12 citations) and Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (65 citations). Emily Browne has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Thailand. Frequent co-authors include Jonathan D. Burlison, James M. Hoffman, Susan D. Scott, Kirsten K. Ness, John C. Panetta, Hiroto Inaba, Mary V. Relling, Yinmei Zhou, Ching‐Hon Pui and Sima Jeha. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Pediatric Oncology Nursing, British Journal of Haematology, Psycho-Oncology, Journal of Patient Safety and Journal of Cancer Survivorship.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact