Emily Bacon
Impact in
-
- University-Industry-Government Innovation Models
- Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
- Strategy and Management top 5%
- Innovation and Knowledge Management
- Business Strategy and Innovation
- Digital Platforms and Economics
Papers in
-
- Innovation and Knowledge Management 4
- Business Strategy and Innovation 1
-
- Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development 2
- Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences 2
- Co-authors
- Michael D. Williams (4 shared papers)Gareth Davies (3 shared papers)Jennifer A. Rudd (2 shared papers)Carla De Laurentis (2 shared papers)Nick Clifton (2 shared papers)David Pickernell (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- International Journal of Information Management (1 paper)Information Systems Frontiers (1 paper)Technology Analysis and Strategic Management (1 paper)Review of Managerial Science (1 paper)Contemporary Social Science (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Emily Bacon
6 papers receiving 261 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 47
- Management of Technology and Innovation 95
- Strategy and Management 182
- Business and International Management 12
- Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management 8
- Communication 27
Countries citing papers authored by Emily Bacon
This map shows the geographic impact of Emily Bacon's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily Bacon with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily Bacon more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Emily Bacon
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily Bacon. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily Bacon. The network helps show where Emily Bacon may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 6 scholars most cited alongside Emily Bacon, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2019 | 141 | |
| 2 | 2019 | 107 | |
| 3 | 2021 | 12 | |
| 4 | 2021 | 7 | |
| 5 | 2022 | 6 | |
| 6 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 7 | 2024 | 0 | |
| 8 | 2025 | 0 |
About Emily Bacon
Emily Bacon is a scholar working on Strategy and Management, Management of Technology and Innovation, Sociology and Political Science, Business and International Management and Marketing, having authored 8 papers that have together received 274 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovation and Knowledge Management (4 papers), Innovation and Socioeconomic Development (3 papers), Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research (3 papers), Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development (2 papers), Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences (2 papers), Service and Product Innovation (2 papers), Business Strategy and Innovation (1 paper) and Sustainable Industrial Ecology (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Management of Technology and Innovation (95 citations), Strategy and Management (182 citations), Business and International Management (12 citations), Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management (8 citations) and Communication (27 citations). Emily Bacon has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Michael D. Williams, Gareth Davies, Jennifer A. Rudd, Carla De Laurentis, Nick Clifton and David Pickernell. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Information Management, Information Systems Frontiers, Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, Review of Managerial Science and Contemporary Social Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.