Emily A. Hutton

20 papers receiving 940 citations

Peers

Emily A. Hutton
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
  • Electrochemistry 647
  • Bioengineering 490
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 100
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 538
  • Spectroscopy 89
Replace M. Březina with:
M. Březina Czechia
Dale H. Karweik United States
Kohji Maeda Japan
David M. Mohilner United States
R. Jaworski Poland
A. J. BARD United States
Giovànni Pezzatini Italy
Barry D. Fleming Australia
G. Quarin Belgium
Satsuo Kamata Japan
Emily A. Hutton relative to M. Březina Czechia M. Březina's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.3×
M. Březina · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Emily A. Hutton

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emily A. Hutton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily A. Hutton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily A. Hutton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emily A. Hutton

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily A. Hutton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily A. Hutton. The network helps show where Emily A. Hutton may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 18 scholars most cited alongside Emily A. Hutton, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Emily A. Hutton Line = papers co-authored together Emily A. Hutton links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 2001145
2 1960115
3 2005112
4 2003102
5 200495
6 200481
7 200570
8 200658
9 196542
10 196331
11 200724
12 196020
13 196416
14 201014
15 196013
16 200513
17 19637
18 19663
19 19613
20 19622

About Emily A. Hutton

Emily A. Hutton is a scholar working on Electrochemistry, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Bioengineering, Physical and Theoretical Chemistry and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, having authored 20 papers that have together received 966 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Electrochemical Analysis and Applications (10 papers), Electrochemical sensors and biosensors (8 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Sensors (7 papers), Photochemistry and Electron Transfer Studies (6 papers), Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (3 papers), Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (2 papers), Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies (2 papers) and Spectroscopy and Laser Applications (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Electrochemistry (647 citations), Bioengineering (490 citations), Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (100 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (538 citations) and Spectroscopy (89 citations). Emily A. Hutton has collaborated with scholars based in Slovenia, United Kingdom and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Božidar Ogorevc, Samo B. Hočevar, Malcolm R. Smyth, B. Stevens, Joseph Wang, Margaret Robson Wright, Johannes T. van Elteren, Rasa Pauliukaitė, J. Tanaka and George Porter. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, Analytica Chimica Acta, Electrochemistry Communications, Electroanalysis and Molecular Physics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact